Change of basis of density matrix

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of changing the basis of a density matrix in quantum mechanics. Participants explore various methods and mathematical formulations related to this transformation, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of density matrices and operators.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on changing a density matrix from one basis to another, indicating a need for more than just the trace.
  • Another participant mentions that the trace of the density matrix is basis independent, suggesting a potential starting point for the discussion.
  • It is proposed that any basis state can be expressed as a linear combination of original basis states, hinting at a relationship that could be derived from the equality of traces.
  • A participant provides a detailed mathematical expansion of the density matrix in terms of the new basis states, introducing the concept of probabilities associated with the states.
  • Another contribution discusses the use of matrix identities involving a unitary matrix and a diagonal matrix of eigenvalues to facilitate the change of basis.
  • A distinction is made between the density matrix and the density operator, with a mathematical representation provided for both in different bases.
  • One participant presents a change-of-basis identity and elaborates on the implications of unitarity in the transformation process, emphasizing the orthonormality of the bases involved.
  • Another participant expresses hope that a specific user remains engaged in the discussion.
  • A later reply acknowledges the helpfulness of the responses and clarifies a previous confusion between the density operator and the density matrix.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views and approaches regarding the change of basis for density matrices. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on a singular method or interpretation.

Contextual Notes

Some mathematical steps and assumptions are not fully resolved, and the dependence on specific definitions of density matrices and operators may influence the interpretations presented.

Bizarre123
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a density matrix in one basis and need to change it to another. I know the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the basis I want to change to. How do I do this?

Any help really appreciated- thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All I can say is that TRACE(ρA) is basis independent.
 
Thanks- but in this case I need to know more than the trace?
 
Any other base state can be represented as a linear combination of original base states(complete).So may be by equality of traces some relation can be obtained for it.
 
If your density matrix is ρ = Σ|i>pij<j| in the original basis with states |i> and probabilities pij, and the new basis states are |α>, then expand the old basis in terms of the new: |i> = Σ|α><α|i>. This gives you ρ = ΣΣΣ|α><α|i>pij<j|β><β| = Σ|α>Pαβ<β| where Pαβ = ΣΣ<α|i>pij<j|β>.
 
By using the matrix identities:
<br /> \mathbf{\rho} \cdot \mathbf{U} = \mathbf{U} \cdot \mathbf{\Lambda}<br />
where U is a unitary matrix (\mathbf{U}^{\dagger} \cdot \mathbf{U} = \mathbf{U} \cdot \mathbf{U}^{\dagger} = 1) whose columns are the normalized eigenvectors of the density matrix, and \Lambda is a diagonal matrix with the corresponding eigenvalues along the main diagonal.
 
I think we should distinguish between the density matrix ρmn and the density operator ρ.

Using a basis {|n>} this reads

\rho = \sum_{mn}\rho_{mn}|m\rangle\langle n|

Now let's introduce a different basis {|k'>}

\rho = \sum_{k^\prime} |k^\prime\rangle\langle k^\prime| \;\;\sum_{mn}\rho_{mn}|m\rangle\langle n|\;\; \sum_{l^\prime} |l^\prime\rangle\langle l^\prime| = \sum_{k^\prime l^\prime} \left(\sum_{mn}\langle k^\prime|m\rangle\,\rho_{mn}\,\langle n|l^\prime\rangle \right) |k^\prime\rangle\langle l^\prime| = \sum_{k^\prime l^\prime}\rho_{k^\prime l^\prime} |k^\prime\rangle\langle l^\prime|
 
The change-of-basis identity:
<br /> \rho_{k&#039; l&#039;} = \sum_{m n}{\langle k&#039; \vert m \rangle \, \rho_{m n} \, \langle n \vert l&#039; \rangle}<br />
with the identification of the matrix:
<br /> U_{n l&#039;} \equiv \langle n \vert l&#039;\rangle<br />
can be rewritten as:
<br /> \mathbf{\rho}&#039; = \mathbf{U}^{\dagger} \cdot \mathbf{\rho} \cdot \mathbf{U}<br />
where we used the fact that:
<br /> \hat{U}^{\dagger}_{k&#039; m} = U^{\ast}_{m k&#039;} = (\langle m \vert k&#039; \rangle)^{\ast} = \langle k&#039; \vert m \rangle<br />

The unitarity of the similarity transformation matrix U is an expression of the orthonormality of the old and new bases:
<br /> \langle m \vert n \rangle = \sum_{k&#039;} {\langle m \vert k&#039; \rangle \, \langle k&#039; \vert n \rangle} = \sum_{k&#039;} {U_{m k&#039;} \, U^{\dagger}_{k&#039; n}} = \left[\mathbf{U} \cdot \mathbf{U}^{\dagger}\right]_{m n} = \delta_{m n} \Rightarrow \mathbf{U} \cdot \mathbf{U}^{\dagger} = \mathbf{1}<br />
<br /> \langle k&#039; \vert l&#039; \rangle = \sum_{m} \langle k&#039; \vert m \rangle \, \langle m \vert l&#039; \rangle = \sum_{m} U^{\dagger}_{k&#039; m} \, U_{m l&#039;} = \left[ \mathbf{U}^{\dagger} \cdot \mathbf{U} \right]_{k&#039; l&#039;} = \delta_{k&#039; l&#039;} \Rightarrow \mathbf{U}^{\dagger} \cdot \mathbf{U} = \mathbf{1}<br />
 
exactly - I hope Bizarre123 is still interested ;-)
 
  • #10
Thanks for the replies- they've been really helpful! Yes, I was getting the density operator and the density matrix confused.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
840
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K