Change of State and Enthelpy; Limiting Reactants

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change State
AI Thread Summary
The discussion covers two chemistry problems involving thermal energy and limiting reactants. In the first problem, the final temperature of coffee after melting an ice cube is calculated to be approximately 94.42 degrees Celsius, accounting for the energy transfer from the coffee to the ice. The second problem involves balancing a chemical equation where 6 moles of reactant A and 12 moles of reactant B yield 9 moles of product C, resulting in the balanced equation 3A + 2B → 3C. A minor correction is noted regarding the temperature change direction in the first problem. The solutions provided are confirmed to be correct with a slight adjustment in the temperature calculation.
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Problem 1:

An ice cube is dropped into a cup containing 196 grams of coffee at 97 degrees C. The thermal energy used to melt the ice is 2.1 kJ. What is the final temperature of the coffee? Assume the specific heat of the coffee is the same as water.

Problem 2:

6 moles of reactant A are mixed with 12 moles of reactant B to produce 9 moles of product C with 3 moles of reactant B left over after the reaction. What is the balanced chemical equation?


Homework Equations



q=mcΔt

balanced equations has lowest whole number coefficients

The Attempt at a Solution



Problem 1:

The solid ice must first reach 0 degrees C. Then it must undergo a phase change at this temperature from a solid to liquid. This requires 2100 Joules of energy as given in the problem. This energy is equivalent to the energy the coffee gives up; this energy comes from the coffee; heat flows from the coffee to the ice cube.

2100 = 195 grams of coffee * 4.184 * (T - 97)

T = 94.42 degrees C.

Problem 2:

The 3 remaining moles imply that only 9 moles of reactant B are required to react with 6 moles of reactant A to form 9 moles of product C.

Therefore,

6A + 9B ---> 9C

Which reduces to

3A + 2B ---> 3C.

Am I right? I believe I am but these problems came without solutions and I'm working these old exam problems in preparation for my chemistry test.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK to me. Just a small error though, it should 97-T instead of T-97. The temperature of coffee decreases.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top