Changes in Density: Does Buoyancy Affect Weight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter matthyaouw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a change in density of an object with fixed mass affects its perceived weight due to buoyancy in the Earth's atmosphere. It is established that buoyancy is influenced by the volume of air displaced, which is affected by the object's density. A hot-air balloon serves as an example, where heated air inside the balloon becomes less dense, allowing it to rise. The conversation also explores the buoyancy effects on solids compared to gases, noting that the impact is less pronounced in solids. Ultimately, calculations indicate that the buoyancy force on a human body in the atmosphere is negligible compared to the gravitational force acting on it.
matthyaouw
Gold Member
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
5
Hey there. I was hoping you guys could help me with this- If the density of an object of fixed mass in the Earth's atmosphere were to change, would it seem to change weight due to more buoyancy in the air?
If you need me to clarify what I mean some more, please ask.

thanks,
Matt
 
Physics news on Phys.org
matthyaouw said:
Hey there. I was hoping you guys could help me with this- If the density of an object of fixed mass in the Earth's atmosphere were to change, would it seem to change weight due to more buoyancy in the air?
If you need me to clarify what I mean some more, please ask.

thanks,
Matt

Well, other than some strange spacetime effects, the only way for something to have a fixed mass but a change in density would be by changing its volume. And since buoyancy is a function of the displaced volume of air, water, etc. that the object is immersed in, then yes, you would change the buoyancy of the object.

Zz.
 
Probably the best example would be the air inside a hot-air baloon. The air inside the balloon is taken form outside, and heated up. It's still basically the same air (plus a little CO2 form the fuel), just hotter. The heat is added to make the air expand (changes its density). The air inside is almost identical to the air outside, just less dense. This decreased density is what makes it lighter, and lifts the balloon.
 
Thanks guys.
Lurch- In your example, you use gasses. I understand that principle, but could you tell me if the same kind of effect would occur between a solid and a gas? I realize that if so, the effect would not be so pronounced as in gasses. I just want to make sure I understand fully.
 
LURCH said:
Probably the best example would be the air inside a hot-air baloon. The air inside the balloon is taken form outside, and heated up. It's still basically the same air (plus a little CO2 form the fuel), just hotter. The heat is added to make the air expand (changes its density). The air inside is almost identical to the air outside, just less dense. This decreased density is what makes it lighter, and lifts the balloon.

It is as Lurch and ZapperZ has explained to you. I'm going to try to go a bit forward and calculate the amount of bouyancy force that is exerted over a human body inside the atmosphere. Thus, we will figure it out and you will be surely more quiet about this.

We will suppose a person shaped like a cylinder of radius R=20cm (he's not too fat) and height H=1.8m.

Approximated Atmospheric pressure distribution:P(z)=P(0)*e^{(-gz/R_gT)}; and supposing a isothermal atmosphere: \rho(z)=\rho(0)*e^{(-gz/R_g T)};

The total force exerted on the body will be:
\overline{F}=\int_{body} P\overline{dS}=\int \int \int_{body} \nabla P dV=\overline{g}\int \int \int_{body} \rho(z) dV=\overline{g}*\pi R^2 \rho(0)\int e^{(-gz/R_g T)}dz=\overline{g}*\pi R^2 \rho(0)\frac{1-e^{(-gH/R_gT)}}{g/R_gT};

So that: F=g*\pi R^2 \rho (0) \frac{1-e^{(-gH/R_gT)}}{g/R_gT}

substituting:
\rho(0)=1.23 Kg/m^3;
R_g=288 J/KgK;
T=293K.

I obtained F=2.7 N. (Check the calculation, maybe I'm wrong).

The force exterted by the gravity over your body is approximately 800 N. The bouyancy force exterted in an isothermal atmosphere over a person is neglected. The reason behind this statement is that the pressure gradients inside a static gas are usually negligible in small intervals of heights. So that, the air pressure at your feet is almost the same at your head. Therefore the bouyancy force is neglected.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top