Changes in volume change total force?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between volume, pressure, and force in the context of gases within a container, specifically examining Boyle's law and the implications of changing volume on internal pressure. Participants explore the mathematical relationships and physical principles involved, including the calculation of force and pressure in different configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the force on a cube based on pressure and area, leading to confusion about the relationship between force, volume, and pressure.
  • Another participant clarifies that Boyle's law applies to a gas in a container, indicating that increasing volume while keeping the amount of gas constant should decrease pressure.
  • Several participants discuss the implications of internal versus external pressure and the nature of forces acting on the walls of the container, with some noting that the total force on the walls is zero.
  • There is a suggestion that pressure is a distributed force rather than a single force acting on a surface, with particles contributing to pressure through multiple collisions.
  • One participant questions whether the formula for pressure is applicable to fluids in a container, seeking clarification on the correct approach to understanding pressure in this context.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of pressure being related to the density of the fluid and gravitational effects, providing an alternative perspective on pressure calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of pressure formulas to fluids in containers and the implications of Boyle's law. There is no consensus on the correct interpretation of the relationship between pressure, volume, and force, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Some participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of fluid mechanics and the complexities of pressure as a vector quantity, highlighting the need for further clarification on the mathematical relationships involved.

Latsabb
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Pressure=Force/Area

If you had a cube, with a volume of one cubic inch, that means that each side would be one inch. As a cube, it would be like a die, and therefore have 6 sides, and 6 square inches.

800 lb/sqinch=force/6sqinches

or

force=(800lb/sqinch)*6sqinches

Force equals 4800 pounds

So now remove a side of the die, and put another die on. Four sides with 2 square inches, and 2 sides with 1 square inch is 10 square inches.

Pressure=4800 pounds/10 sqinches

Pressure then equals 480 PSI

----------------------------------------

However, according to Boyle's law, as you increase volume, pressure decreases inversely. So since the volume doubled, the pressure should have been halved.

Can someone explain why this didnt work out? I am putting money being a problem with my force value, since that force is only a mass, without an acceleration. However, there are no other units in that equation above, so I am confused. Is force changed with volume when it comes to pressure? And if so, is that because the acceleration is somehow changed during compression/decompression?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
Boyles law applies to a gas inside a container.
If you double the volume, but do not change the amount of gas, then the pressure must decrease - since the same amount of gas has more wall area to go around.

What you are doing above is totally different.

If you applied 800lbs/sqin to every face of the 1in cude, the total force on the cube would be zero.
(A cube has opposite pairs of sides.)
Thus the force calculation cannot be correct.

You have noticed that if you double the volume you don't double the surface area.
 
The amount of gas wouldn't be changing. Basically, it would be taking a container that has 1 cubic inch of volume inside of it (I used a cube/die as a better visual aid, and easier math than a sphere) and contains 800 PSI of air in it. Then change the volume of that container to 2 cubic inches.

According to pressure=force/area, that 800 PSI should now be 480 PSI. But Boyle's law says it should be 400. (unless I am misunderstanding Boyle's law... But as I said, the gas won't be changing at all. Same amount of gas. Just doubling the volume)

Edit: I just saw that I never stated that the 800 PSI was inside the die, and not pressing on it from the outside. That is my mistake. Sorry about that. The cube is a container.
 
But the total force on the walls of the container is zero.
 

Increasing "sides" doesn't really matter with Boyle's Law from how I understand it.
piVi = pfVf

If you increase the volume of your die, the internal pressure of the die will decrease.

Are you talking about force being applied externally?
 

Yes, sorry, I had forgotten a bit of information in my haste. The pressure is internal. The die is a container.
 
Simon Bridge said:
But the total force on the walls of the container is zero.

So I am now assuming that pressure=force/area is actually not for fluids in a container. Is that correct? More like for a brick on a sheet of glass? If so, then what would be the correct formula for finding the pressure in a container?
 
Latsabb said:
So I am now assuming that pressure=force/area is actually not for fluids in a container. Is that correct? More like for a brick on a sheet of glass? If so, then what would be the correct formula for finding the pressure in a container?

I think you're making things complicated by making them simple. Imagine a sphere! As volume increases, the pressure decreases. The particles are bouncing evenly off every part of the inside of the container. It's not comparable to a single force being applied. It's an infinite of equal forces being applied in all directions.

PV = nRT, right?
 
For fluids, pressure = rho * g * h, where
rho - mass density of fluid (kg/m^3)
g - acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s^2)
h - depth of fluid at point where pressure is measured (m)

Pressure has units of kg-m^2/(m^3s^2), which by rearranging becomes:
(kg-m/s^2)*(m/m^3) = N/m^2, which is units of force / area.
 
  • #10
Sorry, I haven't really done any fluid mechanics. I learned the pressure formula (looks like it is from a single force, as you say) and thought that I would play with it, and I was told about Boyle's law by someone else. When I found the discrepancy, I wasnt sure why things weren't added up. The idea of there being multiple forces makes sense now, but in my head at the time, the pressure seemed like a single force.

Thank you very much for the help.
 
  • #11
Latsabb said:
Sorry, I haven't really done any fluid mechanics. I learned the pressure formula (looks like it is from a single force, as you say) and thought that I would play with it, and I was told about Boyle's law by someone else. When I found the discrepancy, I wasnt sure why things weren't added up. The idea of there being multiple forces makes sense now, but in my head at the time, the pressure seemed like a single force.

Thank you very much for the help.

Sure!

The actual forces here are movements of individual particle. Every time a tiny little particle bounces off the inside of the container, you have a force. Those millions of millions of particles add up to give your total PSI, and it's pretty much evenly distributed in all directions.
 
  • #12
Latsabb said:
So I am now assuming that pressure=force/area is actually not for fluids in a container. Is that correct? More like for a brick on a sheet of glass? If so, then what would be the correct formula for finding the pressure in a container?
Like tolove says, you seem to be making things confusing by trying to simplify.

The concept of pressure is a force distributed over an area.
An surface of area A under pressure P acts as though it is under a force perpendicular to the surface, through the center of mass, magnitude F=PA.

For a unit cube oriented so the x,y,z axis pass through the center of the appropriate faces, filled with a fluid that exerts pressure P, the effective force on each face will have magnitude F=P(A=1)=P. Since there are six sides, it is tempting to say the total force is 6P.

But force is a vector and the direction of the effective forces will be different for the different faces.

i.e. there are two faces perpendicular to the x axis. One at x=-1/2 and one at x=+1/2.
The force from the pressure acting on the x=-1/2 face acts in the -x direction, and the force from the pressure on the x=+1/2 face acts in the +x direction. Thus, the net force in the x direction is zero. Repeat for the other three axis and the total force is zero.

This should make sense to you: if the pressure inside the container added up to give a large force, like that, then the container would accelerate - but you have seen containers of gas before and they don't accelerate just because their contents are under pressure.I think that what you meant to ask is something like this: "since pressure, generally, is inversely proportional to area, how is it that the pressure of a gas is inversely proportional to volume."

eg.
For a sphere radius R, containing a gas held at constant temperature, doubling R increases the volume 8x and the area 4x.
Since pressure comes from the molecules of gas bouncing off the inside of the sphere - the molecules have 4x more area to bounce off, so you'd expect the pressure to go down to 1/4.
But by ##P_1V_1=P_2V_2## it is actually 1/8 ... so this description of pressure seems to be incomplete. What's missing?

That about right?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K