Changing radius and centripetal force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the comparison of a falling mass and a yo-yo, both initially at the same height and attached to a string of length R. The key question is whether they will take the same time to reach the bottom, considering gravitational force and tension. The analysis reveals that while both have the same initial potential energy, the yo-yo's rotational kinetic energy complicates its motion, suggesting it may not reach the bottom as quickly as the falling mass. Additionally, centripetal force equations indicate that a greater radius could lead to longer descent times, challenging the initial assumption that both would fall simultaneously. Ultimately, the complexities of energy types and forces involved lead to the conclusion that the yo-yo may indeed take longer to reach the bottom.
caljuice
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I have my own concept question.

Ignoring air friction and mass of string, and only considering the motion of the bottom right quarter of a circle, where only gravity acts on the mass.

Lets say I have a mass attached to a rope with length R. I hold the string in my left hand and the mass in the other hand. I let go the mass so it will fall in a circular motion and be vertical at the bottom my left hand.

Now I have a yo-yo with the same mass and with initial R as well. I do the same thing with the yo-yo as I did with the first mass. The yoyo will be changing length as it falls.

Will the yo-yo and the first mass take the same time to reach the bottom? I'm guessing yes because they have the same tension and only force acting on it is gravity. Meaning, they will have the same velocities.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Initially both will have the same potential energy.
In the case of falling mass, at any point the total energy = PE + KE
In the case of yo-yo, at any point the total energy = PE + KE + rotational KE.
Hence at any point linear velocity of mass is greater than the velocity of yo-yo.
 
Interesting, never thought of using energies. But if that's the case, how do we know the yo-yo will be slower for sure. Since the yo-yo is lower at the bottom, it has less PE and so higher KE than the mass? If we ignore the rotational KE of the yo-yo, but still include the increasing length, does this mean for sure the yo-yo will reach the bottom first then?

But if use the equation for centripetal force at the bottom

Using same T-MG for net force.

Fnet = mv2/r = 4pi2r/time.

time=4pi2r/Fnet

Meaning greater R will take longer, thus yo yo should take longer? Meaning I'm wrong about the top assumption?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top