Undergrad Changing spherical coordinates in a Lagrangian

Click For Summary
To compute the Lagrangian in spherical coordinates, the kinetic energy is expressed as T = 1/2 m (dot{r}^2 + r^2 dot{theta}^2 + r^2 sin^2(theta) dot{phi}^2). When redefining the angle theta to represent latitude or the angle from the South Pole (alpha = pi - theta), it is valid to substitute without rebuilding the entire expression, as dot{alpha} equals dot{theta}. The trigonometric identity sin(pi - alpha) simplifies to sin(alpha), confirming that the kinetic energy expression remains unchanged. Ultimately, the change in variable is merely a renaming, with no impact on the kinetic energy formulation.
Jaime_mc2
Messages
8
Reaction score
9
In order to compute de lagrangian in spherical coordinates, one usually writes the following expression for the kinetic energy: $$T = \dfrac{1}{2} m ( \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\theta}^2 + r^2 \sin^2 \theta \dot{\phi}^2 )\ ,$$ where ##\theta## is the colatitud or polar angle and ##\phi## is the azimuthal angle.

My question is what happens if I want to give a different meaning to ##\theta##, for example the latitude itself or even the opposite angle from the South Pole, ##\pi - \theta##.

Let ##\alpha## be such an angle ##\alpha = \pi - \theta##. Since ##\dot{\alpha}=\dot{\theta}##, is it valid to just perform the change of the kinetic energy as $$T = \dfrac{1}{2} m ( \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\alpha}^2 + r^2 \sin^2 (\pi-\alpha) \dot{\phi}^2 )\ ,$$ or do I need to rebuild the expression using the new variable from the beginning? Or maybe the same original expression still holds true?.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the trig identity says ##\sin(\pi-\alpha)=\sin\pi\cos\alpha-\cos\pi\sin\alpha=\sin\alpha##. So your kinetic energy would be ##T = \dfrac{1}{2} m ( \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\alpha}^2 + r^2 \sin^2 (\alpha) \dot{\phi}^2 )##. What's the difference? Answer: Just a name change.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
511
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K