Unifying Dark Energy & Dark Matter: Investigating the Chaplygin Gas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the unification of dark energy and dark matter through the Chaplygin gas model. A participant questions the adequacy of using a single boundary condition for a second-order differential equation, suggesting that an additional condition is necessary. They propose that the second boundary condition should be the value of b(a_{eq}), but note that this complicates the plotting of b/b(a_{eq}) versus a. The need for two boundary conditions is emphasized to accurately solve and visualize the equation using Mathematica. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in modeling dark energy and dark matter interactions.
kptsilva
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hello every one!

How many of you have learned about the unification of dark energy and dark matter?
I'm doing my research regarding the Chaplygin gas and I've come across this research paper.
arxiv.org/pdf/grqc/0202064.pdf

At the end, they solve the equation 36 (3/2*ab′′ + (1 − w)ab′ − (1 + w)(1 − 3αw)b = 0
, and only use one boundary which is b′(aeq) = 0. Don't we need another boundary condition since this is a second order DE?


Any knowledge will be much appreciated!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The other initial condition must be the value of b(a_{eq}). But since what is being plotted is b / b(a_{eq}), this is naturally one on the graph.
 
thank you for the idea!
I'd like to plot this using mathematica, so first i need solve this for b. So it requires two boundary conditions. I can't use the condition b(aeq)=1 since the plot b/b(aeq) vs. a will not be different from b vs. a, right?
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top