Charge distributions & delta functions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of charge density, specifically when charge Q is distributed on a 2-sphere of radius R. The charge density, represented as rho=(Q/2piR^2)delta(r-R), indicates that rho is zero everywhere except on the sphere's surface, where it is effectively infinite. This interpretation aligns with the concept of an infinitely thin spherical shell, where the charge density appears infinite due to the thinness of the shell. The conversation acknowledges the mathematical nature of the delta function as a distribution while emphasizing the physical implications, such as the practical considerations of charge distribution in conductors and the need to sometimes move beyond strict mathematical interpretations to understand physical phenomena.
homology
Messages
305
Reaction score
1
Okay so say we have charge Q on a 2-sphere of radius R then the charge distribution will be rho=(Q/2piR^2)delta(r-R), which gives Q when integrated over space.

1) So my question is, what does this say about rho? To me, it says that rho is zero everywhere except on the surface of the sphere where it is infinite.

P.S. yes I know the delta function is really a distribution. What I'm asking for is a Physicist's interpretation of the charge density.

Thanks,

kevin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To me, it says that rho is zero everywhere except on the surface of the sphere where it is infinite.
you are right.. you can imagine there are total charge Q distribute on an infinite thin spherical metal sheet.. since the metal sheet is so thin, pho=Q/V goes to infinite on the surface of sphere
 
Physically, there is a skin depth to the current of a few nanometers in a good conductor. But for things like surface integrals it is convenient to regard it as infinitesimally thin so that we can use the calculus.

Sometimes you just have to step outside the math (lthe way we all know there is no ifinite force do to a charged point particle just because of 1/r^2).
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top