Does an Electron's Increased B Field Exist Outside a Black Hole's Event Horizon?

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
Lets say an electron crosses the event horizon of a black hole.
Now as it starts speeding up when it gets closer to the center of the black hole
its B field will increase. Does this increased B field exist outside the event horizon?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:
Lets say an electron crosses the event horizon of a black hole.
Now as it starts speeding up when it gets closer to the center of the black hole
its B field will increase. Does this increased B field exist outside the event horizon?

No. Changes in electrical and magnetic fields propagate at the speed of light, and even light cannot cross the horizon outwards. Equivalently, all the effects of the electron's motion are in its future lightcone, and after the electron crosses the horizon no part of that lightcone lies outside the horizon.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
43
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top