Charge in RLC circuit when starting charges are 2Q and Q

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the terminal charge on a capacitor in an RLC circuit when the initial charges are +2Q on one plate and 0 on the other. Participants explore various interpretations of charge distribution, conservation of charge, and the implications of disconnecting the capacitor from the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the terminal charge on the capacitor will be +Q on both plates, resulting in no net flow of charge.
  • Others argue that charge is conserved and that the voltage across the capacitor must eventually go to zero.
  • One participant questions how an unbalanced charge can exist if the capacitor is disconnected from the circuit.
  • Another participant suggests that the charge on the capacitor can be calculated as (Q1-Q2)/2, where Q1 and Q2 are the charges on the plates.
  • Some participants emphasize that the charges on the two plates must always be equal and opposite, challenging the notion of having +2Q and 0Q on the plates.
  • There is a proposal to consider the scenario of charging the capacitor with an uncharged plate brought close to a charged plate and then connecting it to an RLC circuit.
  • One participant describes a hypothetical situation where charge is deposited on each plate by an unspecified process, leading to a discussion about the final charge distribution after transients die away.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition and implications of charge distribution in the capacitor. There is no consensus on the final charges on the plates, and multiple competing interpretations remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of disconnecting the capacitor and the geometric properties of capacitance, indicating that assumptions about the system's configuration and charge distribution may affect the conclusions drawn.

  • #31
vanhees71 said:
You can in principle have such an unusual initial condition and why not asking for the dynamics of this unusual "circuit", but I think it's not as easy to solve as it looks at the first glance. I'm not so sure, whether one can use the standard AC circuit theory in terms of the parameters R, L, and C; particularly the latter, which has a well-defined meaning for the case that the capacitor is connected to a (DC) voltage source, which implies that one plate carries a charge Q and the other a charge -Q, and then you use the quasistatic approximation for the AC case too, which is legitimate if the typical wavelength of the em. waves involved is very large compared to the extension of the circuit.

This is indeed a thorny issue. I think whether we can use AC circuits to handle its dynamics will depend on how we define the circuit model. Because the capacitor has an unusual initial condition [2Q,0Q], although there will be a potential difference between the two conductors of this capacitor, part of the charge stored on the two conductors must not belong to this capacitor.

If we assume that this experiment is carried out in an empty cosmic space, and there are no objects in the endless space around this circuit, including people who try to do this experiment will use the remote control to carry out this experiment, then the electric field lines generated by the extra charge mentioned above will extend to the endless cosmic space and never return, and its distance is likely to be much greater than the EM wave wavelength of the original AC LCR circuit, which will make the effectiveness of the use of the AC circuit questionable. :cry:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
If we were to examine the behaviour of an RLC circuit on Earth (one terminal of the C being earthed) and then charge the Earth with an "extra" +Coulomb, would our answers be any different? I think superposition would work here, as long as the surface field of the Earth could be considered uniform over a reasonably big area.
 
  • #33
No matter where the experiment site is, people may ask similar questions. It may not be much different on the surface of the Earth or in the empty space of the universe

After further thinking about this problem, I think it is not difficult to solve it from an engineering perspective. Simply put, it is to ignore the extra charge on the capacitor that is not clearly defined or difficult to handle in the analysis (of course, the premise is that it does not constitute a non-negligible danger or impact).

The method is very simple, that is, first measure the potential difference and capacitance of the capacitor, and then we can calculate the charge that belongs to the capacitor and the extra charge that does not belong to the capacitor. When the LR circuit is connected to the capacitor, we only perform dynamic analysis based on the charge belonging to the capacitor, that is, the measured voltage and capacitance are all the information we need for dynamic analysis. :smile:

Of course, when the LR circuit is connected, the extra charge may also move between the two conductors of the capacitor, but if for special reasons, the effect of the extra charge cannot be integrated into the equivalent AC circuit by adding an additional capacitors, then except ignoring it , I can't think of any other way to deal with it now. :sorry:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
629
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K