Charge on capacitor connected between spheres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the charge distribution on two metallic spheres connected by a capacitor after closing a switch. The final charge on the capacitor is derived using conservation of energy principles, although it is noted that electrical potential energy is not conserved due to energy dissipation as heat or electromagnetic radiation. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between the electric potentials of the spheres and the capacitor, particularly at equilibrium. A key equation is established using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to relate the potentials and the charge on the capacitor. Ultimately, the correct approach leads to the conclusion that the charge on the capacitor can be expressed as Q/(2 + 4πε₀R/C).
Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


Two metallic spheres, each of radius R having charges 2Q and Q are joined through a capacitor of capacitance C as shown in the figure. Assuming R<<d, the charge on the capacitor long time after the key K is closed is:

(Ans: ##\dfrac{Q}{2+\frac{4\pi \epsilon_0 R}{C}}##)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The final distribution of charges should be as shown in attachment 2.
From conservation of energy:
$$\frac{(2Q)^2}{2x}+\frac{Q^2}{2x}=\frac{(2Q-q)^2}{2x}+\frac{q^2}{2C}+\frac{(Q+q)^2}{2x}$$
where ##x=4\pi \epsilon_0 R##.

Solving the above doesn't give me the right answer. :confused:

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • capacitor and spheres 1.png
    capacitor and spheres 1.png
    5.4 KB · Views: 588
  • capacitor and spheres 2.png
    capacitor and spheres 2.png
    5.5 KB · Views: 545
Physics news on Phys.org
The electrical potential energy is not conserved in this problem. Think about the final electric potential of each sphere and the capacitor.
 
TSny said:
The electrical potential energy is not conserved in this problem.
Why the energy isn't conserved in this case?
Think about the final electric potential of each sphere and the capacitor.
Final electric potentials of the left sphere, capacitor and right spheres are ##\frac{k(2Q-q)}{R}##, ##q/C## and ##\frac{k(Q+q)}{R}## respectively but I don't see what to do with the potentials. :confused:
 
How does the potential difference between the spheres relate to the potential difference across the plates of the capacitor?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Why the energy isn't conserved in this case?

In any problem involving redistribution of charges in a circuit, it's not safe to assume conservation of electrical energy. There is always "hidden" dissipation of energy as heat or EM waves, even when a circuit has no apparent resistance.

You'll notice this when working problems where a fully charged capacitor is then connected across an uncharged capacitor. Charge is conserved but the sum of the final PEs is not the same as what was present before. Energy is apparently "lost".

Final electric potentials of the left sphere, capacitor and right spheres are ##\frac{k(2Q-q)}{R}##, ##q/C## and ##\frac{k(Q+q)}{R}## respectively but I don't see what to do with the potentials. :confused:

At equilibrium, what can you say about the potential of the left sphere with respect to the left plate of the capacitor? And then about the potential of the right sphere with respect to the right plate of the capacitor? And about the potential difference across the capacitor plates?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Why the energy isn't conserved in this case?

There will be conversion of electric potential energy into other forms of energy such as Joule heating and radiation.
 
TSny said:
How does the potential difference between the spheres relate to the potential difference across the plates of the capacitor?

Curious3141 said:
At equilibrium, what can you say about the potential of the left sphere with respect to the left plate of the capacitor? And then about the potential of the right sphere with respect to the right plate of the capacitor? And about the potential difference across the capacitor plates?

I made the circuit shown in attachment for the final configuration.

By KVL, I get:
$$\frac{k(2Q-q)}{R}-\frac{q}{C}-\frac{k(Q+q)}{R}=0$$
Solving the above gives me the right answer but I guess there is a better way to get the above equation?
 

Attachments

  • capacitor and spheres 3.png
    capacitor and spheres 3.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 517
Pranav-Arora said:
I made the circuit shown in attachment for the final configuration.

By KVL, I get:
$$\frac{k(2Q-q)}{R}-\frac{q}{C}-\frac{k(Q+q)}{R}=0$$
Solving the above gives me the right answer but I guess there is a better way to get the above equation?

What I did is exactly what I wrote. At equilibrium, each plate of the capacitor will have the same potential as the sphere it's connected to (otherwise charge will still move and it will not be a stable equilibrium state). Let the left sphere and left plate (positive as it gains charge) be at voltage ##V_L## and the right plate (negative as it loses charge) and right sphere be at voltage ##V_R##.

Then the potential difference across the capacitor is ##V_L - V_R##, which you can equate to ##\frac{q}{C}##.

Plug in all your variables to replace the voltage terms and you have a simple equation that almost immediately gives you the required answer.
 
Last edited:
Curious3141 said:
What I did is exactly what I wrote. At equilibrium, each plate of the capacitor will have the same potential as the sphere it's connected to (otherwise charge will still move and it will not be a stable equilibrium state). Let the left sphere and left plate (positive as it gains charge) be at voltage ##V_L## and the right plate (negative as it loses charge) and right sphere be at voltage ##V_R##.

Then the potential difference across the capacitor is ##V_L - V_R##, which you can equate to ##\frac{q}{C}##.

Plug in all your variables to replace the voltage terms and you have a simple equation that almost immediately gives you the required answer.

Understood, thanks a lot Curious and TSny! :smile:
 
Back
Top