Charge on spheres connected by wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the charge on two metallic spheres connected by a wire, with a total charge of 2.600 C. The user initially considers using the formula (kq)/r and the relationship Q1 + Q2 = 2.600 C, but struggles with the influence of one sphere on the other due to their proximity. They recognize that this influence affects how to equate the electric potentials of the spheres. Ultimately, the user indicates they have figured out the problem but anticipates needing further assistance with electric field and potential questions in the future. The conversation highlights the complexities of charge distribution in connected conductive objects.
Dopefish1337
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A total charge of 2.600 C is shared by two metallic spheres A (radius 7.00 cm) and B (radius 5.00 cm) that are connected by a thin wire of length 1.00 m. Find the charge on sphere A. (Note that the influence of sphere B is not negligible.)

Homework Equations



I presume that (kq)/r will come into play, and also that Q1+Q2 will equal 2.600 C

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that for a similar problem where the distance between the two spheres can be considered large enough that their influence is negligable that the problem can simply be solved by rearranging q1+q2=2.6C to find one of the charges in terms of the other, and substituting that result into (kq1)/r1=(kq2)/r2 will allow one to find the charges.

However, I don't know how to approach the problem in the knowledge that the influence of one sphere on the other is no longer negligable. I suspect it will have an influence on how I equate the potentials, but I'm not sure exactly how. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Figured it out. :)

I'm sure I'll have another electric field/electric potential question coming up for you guys over the next few days though, so you'll have another oppurtunity to welcome me :P
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top