Charge problem, used a quadtratic equation, can you see if i did it right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr_coffee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
AI Thread Summary
To find the position of particle 3 where the net electrostatic force is zero, the calculations confirm that the coordinates should be X = -31.385 cm and Y = 0 cm. The method used was deemed overly complex, as a simpler approach could have yielded the same results more efficiently. The discussion clarified that the negative coordinate is correct due to the placement of the charges on the x-axis. Participants confirmed the validity of the quadratic equation used, while also noting the importance of correctly interpreting the coordinate system. The final consensus is that the coordinates for particle 3 are indeed X = -31.385 cm and Y = 0 cm.
mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone. I need to see if I did this right. the problem is this:
Particle 1 of charge 1.0E-6 C and particle 2 of charge -2.0E-6 C are held at separation L = 13.0cm on an x axis. If particle 3 of unkonwn charge q3 is to be located such that the net electrostatifc force on it from particles 1 and 2 is zero what must be the coordinates of particle 3?

Here is my drawing and work:
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/2886/quad5nx.jpg

So would the answer be X = 31.385 cm Y = 0 cm?


Also another quick question...
http://img76.imageshack.us/img76/510/22115ph.gif shows four situations in which charged particles are fixed in place on an axis.


In which situations is there a point to the left of the particles where an electron will be in equilibrium? (Select all that apply.)
situation b and a were the only ones that made senes to me. Does that seem right?

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
with the smaller charge q at x=0, and the -2q at x=13m,
the E-field contributions cancel farther from the -2q.
How much farther? sqrt(2) farther than from the small q.
(so ratio 2q/(sqrt(2)*d)^2 = 1)
(d+130mm) = 1.414 (d) , so .414d = 130mm
no quadratic needed
 
My professor told me to use the quadratic, so my solution is incorrect? If i convert your 130mm to cm's it doesn't come even close to my answer. If you would use my method, what did i screw up? thanks for the reply
 
mr_coffee said:
My professor told me to use the quadratic, so my solution is incorrect?
Your solution is correct.
 
Thanks Doc, quick question, Is it suppose to be negative answer or postive answer? becuase I placed the charge on the negative x-axis. and it is wanting the Y coordinates and x coordinates. Y = 0 cm, but would X = -31 or X = 31?
 
I believe you are perfectly correct with your answer however your method was over-laborious. If you had canceled the 10^6 and expressed d in terms of a separation you could get the quadratic terms out much more quickly

the roots i got in the form 13(1 + sqrt(2)) and 13(1 - sqrt(2)) confirm what you got.

note however that it the co-ordinate system you sketch the charge is at (-31.385,0)
 
mr_coffee said:
Thanks Doc, quick question, Is it suppose to be negative answer or postive answer? becuase I placed the charge on the negative x-axis. and it is wanting the Y coordinates and x coordinates. Y = 0 cm, but would X = -31 or X = 31?
As gnpatterson already explained, if you put the positive charge at X = 0 and the negative charge at X = 13 cm, then the coordinates of your answer will be X = -31 cm.

In your equation, d stands for the distance from the charge at X = 0. Once you found the solution of the equation, it is up to you to translate the answer into the format required: a coordinate along the x-axis.
 
thanks guys!
 
Back
Top