What happens to cations and electrons during and after a gas discharge event?

AI Thread Summary
Cations and electrons are generated during a gas discharge event between the cathode and anode, but their fate post-discharge is less understood. The discussion raises questions about the behavior of these charged particles after they interact with the electrodes, particularly in an open air discharge scenario. It is speculated that when a cation reaches the cathode simultaneously with an electron hitting the anode, the electron is absorbed and the cation draws an electron from the cathode. However, the presence of ozone odor suggests that some electrons or cations may escape the electric field without recombining, indicating potential unaccounted charges. This theory aligns with established physics but requires further exploration for confirmation.
vis viva
Messages
29
Reaction score
10
As I understand both cations and electrons are produced between cathode and anode in a gas discharge, but what is their imminent fate, during and post discharge event? The majority of information I could find only covers the electrons from the time of the first ionization event to impacting the anode, but no word about what happens afterwards, and the cations are not mentioned at all either.

For the purpose of education, let's assume open air discharge.

For reference, taken from wiki
640px-Electron_avalanche.gif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, then I will venture a guess myself, let me know if I need to apply for a tuition refund.

I'm guessing that if there is a cation at cathode the exact same moment an electrons impacts the anode, then electron will be absorbed by the anode and the cation will suck out an electron from the cathode.

I also guess the above would satisfy nature's accountant in theory, but what about the distinct ozone odor associated with an open air discharge? That would either indicate to me that there could be unaccounted electrons in the circuit and/or that some electrons and cations can leave the electric field without recombining.

Would that be a plausible explanation in accordance with prevailing physics?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top