Charging a battery by moving a magnet randomly in 2D plane?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of generating sufficient electromotive force (EMF) to charge a battery by moving a magnet randomly in a two-dimensional plane, specifically through a conductive arrangement embedded in a flat panel. Participants explore the implications of random motion, power transfer, and the configuration of coils or wires necessary for effective energy harvesting.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that achieving a consistent EMF from random magnet motion is unlikely, but if the EMF is sufficiently high, it could potentially power a rectifier.
  • Concerns are raised about the nature of magnetic fields, specifically that the field of a magnet is closed, which could lead to cancellation effects when passing through a single coil.
  • One suggestion involves using a grid of wires that could dynamically reconfigure to connect to the circuit based on the magnet's position, potentially optimizing energy collection.
  • Participants discuss the relationship between the movement of a magnet and the induced current in conductive materials, questioning whether a bar magnet can replace a charged particle in this context.
  • References to existing technologies, such as shake-powered flashlights, are made to illustrate the potential for energy harvesting in similar applications.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the effectiveness of their proposed methods and seek clarification on the underlying principles of electromagnetism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express skepticism about the ability to generate a consistent EMF from random magnet motion, indicating a lack of consensus on the feasibility of the proposed method. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the optimal configuration and effectiveness of energy harvesting techniques.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the magnetic field behavior, the dependence on specific configurations of coils or wires, and the unresolved mathematical steps necessary to determine the viability of charging a battery.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring energy harvesting technologies, DIY project enthusiasts, and those studying electromagnetism and its applications in practical scenarios.

Jefffff
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I'm sorry if this question is a little abstract, but would appreciate any guidance! It's for a DIY project I am considering.

Suppose you have a flat panel mounted on a wall, and a very strong magnet that will move in any direction on the plane of the flat panel. Through any possible arrangement of conductive wiring in the same plane as the panel (embedded in the panel), is it possible to generate sufficient EMF to charge a battery?

My grasp on this is limited, but I think that it is possible, but I'm unsure of the random motion aspect of it. Is there a possible arrangement of the coil that would result in a consistent EMF to charge a battery regardless of the random 2D motion the magnet makes? If so, what would be the most effective arrangement that maximizes power with minimum coil material for any motion?

If the question seems a bit complicated, any reference to the right direction/method I would use to solve this would also be greatly appreciated!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Jefffff said:
Is there a possible arrangement of the coil that would result in a consistent EMF to charge a battery

I can be wrong but my take is that it is highly unlikely you will be able to obtain a consistent EMF, but if the EMF is high enough it can be used to power a rectifier capable of smoothing out the output.
 
One possible issue is that the field of a magnet is closed. Eg the field near one pole loops around to the other pole. So the field would pass through a single coil in both directions cancelling out.

I think you would need a grid of wires in the plane dynamically reconfigured so that those near the pole are connected to the collecting circuit while those further away where the field is in the other direction are disconnected. Something like that.
 
Can you expand on the details of the situation you are trying to harvest energy from?

BoB
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
Since you're wanting to charge a battery this is really about power transfer. i.e. how much power moves the magnet and how much of it can be harvested at the battery. The answer will depend on a lot of things but it can be possible. For example: shake powered flashlights do exist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanically_powered_flashlight#Shake_type_design

I would start with a basic dimensional analysis to figure out if your application makes sense. A reference like this has the equations and figures you need to figure it out. http://physics.gsu.edu/hsu/LCh23.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
rbelli1 said:
Can you expand on the details of the situation you are trying to harvest energy from?

BoB

I'm trying to use an magnetophoretic film (like the ones from these toys: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B005NJT4S2/?tag=pfamazon01-20
and figure out a way to generate power through the user's drawing movements, but at a much larger scale than the toy. The end of the pen has a magnet which attracts negatively charged pigment particles out of the white suspension medium in the board.
 
Borek said:
I can be wrong but my take is that it is highly unlikely you will be able to obtain a consistent EMF, but if the EMF is high enough it can be used to power a rectifier capable of smoothing out the output.

Yeah, I thought that the EMF might be wildly inconsistent / in opposing directions depending on the movement. Thanks for your input!
 
CWatters said:
One possible issue is that the field of a magnet is closed. Eg the field near one pole loops around to the other pole. So the field would pass through a single coil in both directions cancelling out.

I think you would need a grid of wires in the plane dynamically reconfigured so that those near the pole are connected to the collecting circuit while those further away where the field is in the other direction are disconnected. Something like that.

I understand where you're coming from - if you had a simple bar magnet, however held it vertically from the plane such that the S end was further from the plane than the N end, wouldn't the field in one direction be stronger? The other issue arises which would be the direction of nearby coils in the grid, which might produce opposing currents in the coil right? Please correct me if I'm wrong, just speculating. Thanks for the reply.
 
eq1 said:
Since you're wanting to charge a battery this is really about power transfer. i.e. how much power moves the magnet and how much of it can be harvested at the battery. The answer will depend on a lot of things but it can be possible. For example: shake powered flashlights do exist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanically_powered_flashlight#Shake_type_design

I would start with a basic dimensional analysis to figure out if your application makes sense. A reference like this has the equations and figures you need to figure it out. http://physics.gsu.edu/hsu/LCh23.pdf

Thanks for the links eq1 - I've done some courses in electromagnetism and understand the fundamental mathematics behind it. From a very simple 1D model where you have a conductive wire going along the x-axis, if you move a bar magnet around near the wire, a current will be produced in the wire. This is my core assumption, but I'm not sure if its true based on what CWatters said. Extending it to a 2D model, if you had wires running in X and Y directions, moving a charged particle would produce a current in these wires. Can I replace a charged particle with a bar magnet or is the effect for my model not the same?
 
  • #10
Jefffff said:
and figure out a way to generate power through the user's drawing movements,

What is it that you want to use the energy for?

BoB
 
  • #11
rbelli1 said:
What is it that you want to use the energy for?

BoB

Because it's a magnetophoretic board, I want to be able to store this energy, and release it to quickly "wipe" the board by running a charge through the board. By drawing energy from the act of drawing on the board itself, I might be able to implement the "erase" and other functions without external power.
 
  • #12
Jefffff said:
Thanks for the links eq1 - I've done some courses in electromagnetism and understand the fundamental mathematics behind it. From a very simple 1D model where you have a conductive wire going along the x-axis, if you move a bar magnet around near the wire, a current will be produced in the wire. This is my core assumption, but I'm not sure if its true based on what CWatters said. Extending it to a 2D model, if you had wires running in X and Y directions, moving a charged particle would produce a current in these wires. Can I replace a charged particle with a bar magnet or is the effect for my model not the same?

Yes that will produce something. What you can't do is have the magnet entirely within the coil as all the flux would be in the coil all the time. That's what I was trying to say earlier.

With a grid of wires you can use Faraday's law to work out the voltage induced in each wire as the magnet passes.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/genwir2.html

I suspect you will need multiple turns just to generate enough to rectify it with diodes.

I think a small solar panel charging a battery might be easier.
 
  • #13
Jefffff said:
Thanks for the links eq1 - I've done some courses in electromagnetism and understand the fundamental mathematics behind it. From a very simple 1D model where you have a conductive wire going along the x-axis, if you move a bar magnet around near the wire, a current will be produced in the wire. This is my core assumption, but I'm not sure if its true based on what CWatters said. Extending it to a 2D model, if you had wires running in X and Y directions, moving a charged particle would produce a current in these wires. Can I replace a charged particle with a bar magnet or is the effect for my model not the same?

You're being sloppy and thus confusing the question.

There are two parts to your question.
  1. Qualitative: Can you induce current in a wire with a moving magnet?
  2. Quantitative: Is that enough to charge a battery? That's what you asked in your original post. You didn't specify what kind of battery, or whether you mean charge it completely, or just to begin charging at all.
The answer to 1 is yes.

The answer to 2 must be yes in some circumstances. We could never have electric generators otherwise. So your question reduces to just the quantitative. Do the circumstances you describe transform enough energy to charge a battery? (whatever that means)

I'm afraid that you would have to be more exact in the description to offer a good answer. Making it more complex, such as going from 1D to 2D just obscures the basic question.

Give us the dimensions and strength of the magnet. It's orientation and speed. Specify the gauge and exact layout of the wires and their connections to the load. Specify the battery, and the state of charge required. If you do that, and if you understand Faraday's Law and Lenz's Law as you said, then you should be able to calculate the answer yourself.

Without that, the answer to the qualitative question is "It depends."

A non-mathematical approach to the qualitative question was suggested by @eq1 in post #5. Those shake-to-light flashlights are analogous to your idea. That is a voltage and power level in the same order of magnitude as charging a battery. Look at the magnets and wires, and the battery, inside those flashlights, consider the vigor needed to shake them, and consider how quickly the LED goes out when you stop shaking (about 1 minute shaking gives 10 seconds light), then imagine how many hours it might take to completely charge the battery, and you have a guess at your answer.
31PTZALa8UL._SX425_.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 31PTZALa8UL._SX425_.jpg
    31PTZALa8UL._SX425_.jpg
    8.3 KB · Views: 420
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
  • #14
If you conceal an array of flat coils behind the panel, each with its own rectifier, then waving a powerful magnet in front will generate a small amount of power. Analogy is a wind-up torch, where you crank a tiny motor as a generator. Efficiency would be very, very low, of course.

FWIW, you might find you're harvesting micro-power without the magnet due to RFI from house wiring, local radio station, WiFi etc etc. Think wireless charger...

This used to be a regular 'science fair' project, an LC tuned to powerful local radio station rectified to micro-power a one-transistor amplifier for a distant station...
 
  • #15
anorlunda said:
That is a voltage and power level in the same order of magnitude as charging a battery. Look at the magnets and wires, and the battery, inside those flashlights, consider the vigor needed to shake them, and consider how quickly the LED goes out when you stop shaking (about 1 minute shaking gives 10 seconds light), then imagine how many hours it might take to completely charge the battery, and you have a guess at your answer.

I have one of those flashlights. One minute of shaking charges the capacitor, not battery, enough to give a couple seconds of useful light then many minutes of glow that is not particularly useful.

The easiest way to determine if the OP's idea would work would be to build one for erase only. Measure how much energy is needed to erase one time. Next estimate how much energy can be stored with one drawing. If the numbers are close then you have some confidence to build a real charging one to test out.

BoB
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
17K