Charging and Discharging capacitor problem .

  • Thread starter Thread starter nishantve1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Charging
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving two capacitors, one charged and one initially uncharged, connected through a resistor. The correct approach to find the charge on the second capacitor over time involves solving a differential equation rather than using direct charge equations. The final charge on the second capacitor is determined to be Q/2, and the time-dependent charge equation is established as Q(t) = Q/2(1 - e^(-2t/RC)). Participants confirm the method and calculations, emphasizing the importance of correctly denoting variables and understanding the equivalent capacitance in the circuit. The solution is validated as correct by the contributors.
nishantve1
Messages
74
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The question says
A capacitor of capacitance C is given a charge Q . at time t = 0 This capacitor is then connected to another identical capacitor which was initially uncharged through a resistance R .
Find the charge on the second capacitor as a function of time .
( I am assuming that the second capacitor is the uncharged capacitor .)

Homework Equations



Charging a capacitor through resistance R and Potential difference ε :
Q(t) = εC(1 -e^(-t/RC) )
where e is the constant ( e = 2.78... )

Discharging a capacitor through a resistance r
Q(t) = Q(initial) * e^(-t/RC)
where e is the constant ( e = 2.78... )

The Answer to the question is :
Q(t) = Q/2(1-e^(-2t/RC))

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright so the Capacitor 1 initially had charge Q so when it will be connected to another uncharged capacitor it will discharge whereas the other capacitor which was initially uncharged will get charged and the total charge will remain constant at any time t.
So if the first capacitor is getting Discharged then
Q(t) = Q(* e^(-t/RC) )

And the second one is getting discharged so
Q(t) = εC(1 -e^(-t/RC) ) -------- (i)

Since the Potential difference ε itself is a function of time so ,
I went to the charge on first capacitor and used
Q = Cε
ε = Q/C
Since C is constant so the ε across first capacitor will also be changing as (and the 1 capacitor is discharging also)
ε(t) = [Q * e^(-t/RC) ]/C

so now I substitute this in (i)
Q(t) = [Q * e^(-t/RC) ]/C * C(1 -e^(-t/RC) )
so the charge at t on the second will be
= [Q * e^(-t/RC) ] * (1 -e^(-t/RC) )

but the answer is
Q(t) = Q/2(1-e^(-2t/RC))

Where am i wrong ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The method you tried is not correct. You need to solve the differential equation of the circuit. Write up the voltages in terms of q, the charge on the initially empty capacitor. Their sum is zero. Solve the equation with the initial condition that q(0)=0.

ehild
 
ehild said:
The method you tried is not correct. You need to solve the differential equation of the circuit. Write up the voltages in terms of q, the charge on the initially empty capacitor. Their sum is zero. Solve the equation with the initial condition that q(0)=0.

ehild

I did this and got the answer but I am not sure whether its right
so first I found the equivalent capacitance which would be for two Capacitors connected in series would be C/2
so now the time constant (RC) would be RC/2
also for charging the second capacitor since it was initially uncharged the final charge on it would be half of the charge on the first since they both are identical
so final charge on second is Q/2
Now the equation
Q(t) = εC(1-e^-t/RC)

Using Q = CV
V = Q/C
I am thinking that
εC would be the final charge on the capacitor
that is Q/2 so using the relation
I found
ε = Q/2C

I substituted it in the Q(t) equation
THis gives
Q(t) = Q/2 (1-e^-2t/RC)
Thats the answer
is the method right ? any problems with it ?
 
nishantve1 said:
I did this and got the answer but I am not sure whether its right
so first I found the equivalent capacitance which would be for two Capacitors connected in series would be C/2
so now the time constant (RC) would be RC/2

Correct :smile:
nishantve1 said:
also for charging the second capacitor since it was initially uncharged the final charge on it would be half of the charge on the first since they both are identical
so final charge on second is Q/2

Right!

nishantve1 said:
Now the equation
Q(t) = εC(1-e^-t/RC)

You meant Q(t) = εC(1-e^(-t/RC')) where C'=C/2...And it is better to denote the charge on the second capacitor by q, as Q is used for the initial charge on the first one. q(t)=εC(1-e^(-2t/RC)). Also do not forget the parentheses!

nishantve1 said:
Using Q= CV
V = Q/C
I am thinking that
εC would be the final charge on the capacitor
that is Q/2 so using the relation
I found
ε = Q/2C

I substituted it in the Q(t) equation
THis gives
Q(t) = Q/2 (1-e^(-2t/RC))
Thats the answer
is the method right ? any problems with it ?

It is all right...

ehild
 
Last edited:
ehild said:
You meant Q(t) = εC(1-e^(-t/RC')) where C'=C/2...And it is better to denote the charge on the second capacitor by q, as Q is used for the initial charge on the first one. q(t)=εC(1-e^(-2t/RC)). Also do not forget the parentheses!

ehild

Yeah its C' . Thanks .
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top