Charlie Johnson: Finding Research Area for PhD Programs

AI Thread Summary
Charlie Johnson, a recent Stanford graduate in Engineering Physics, is preparing to apply for PhD programs while grappling with his diverse research interests in Terahertz research, atomic physics, and nanoscience related to energy issues. He is contemplating whether to apply for Physics or Applied Physics programs, leaning towards the latter due to perceived admission difficulties. Concerns about presenting his varied interests in applications are raised, alongside questions about the flexibility to explore different research areas during lab rotations in graduate school. It's suggested that he focus on specific projects he enjoys rather than program reputation, and that having multiple interests is acceptable. Ultimately, he should consider the opportunities that arise during the application process.
cjohnson415
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello PF community,

My name is Charlie Johnson. I just graduated from Stanford where I did a B.S. in Engineering Physics. I am studying for the Physics GRE and planning to apply to PhD programs this Fall. I have many interests both in and outside of school, and so I find it difficult to choose a research area.

I spent one summer doing nanofabrication, one summer programming, and one summer doing Terahertz research. I liked the Terahertz research because I had more independence compared to my nanofab research, where I was more of an assistant.

I am considering either trying out Atomic, Molecular, and Optical physics, mostly because it is new and exciting and involves lasers. I like that it has the potential to test novel physics. On the other hand, as a person I am very passionate about the environment and energy issues, so I am also potentially interested in nanoscience to study something along the lines of energy storage and conversion.

This leads me to two questions. 1. Should I apply for Physics or Applied Physics PhD programs? My sense is that it is harder to get into Physics programs, so I am leaning towards applying to AP, at least at places like Stanford, Cal, and Harvard. Will either one limit my flexibility to find a research advisor?

2. What should I say about my research interests in my applications? I am weary of sounding too unfocused about my interests, even though it is probably true. How much flexibility will I have to explore when I arrive at a grad school? My understanding is that you can fit in 2-3 lab rotations in the first year, but is it a bad idea to explore vastly different areas in lab rotations?

Any advice on this general question would be much appreciated. I love science, and I want to feel that my work has meaning, but I also love to understand things in a fundamental way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to spend a little more time exploring your interests.

Read.

You may have a hard time with just browsing through journal articles, but look for review articles, look through journals like Physics Today or Nature.

In my opinion, it's best to select a program based on the specific project or area that you're interested in, rather that the reputation of the program or whether it's considered "applied physics" or not (this label is likely to vary from school to school). You don't have to have the details of the project spelled out, but if you take a hard look at the stuff that you've most enjoyed reading about, and combine that with the experiences you've had, then usually some vague picture of where you want to go starts to form.

It is quite possible to have more than one interest too. In such cases apply to both and then make a choice from the opportunities that present themselves.

For what it's worth, the degree of flexibility can vary from school to school. In my experience you spend your first year on course work and really don't have to have a project selected until summer rolls around.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top