Cheap Sensor Function Checker for 120 RPM with 24V Output

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a cost-effective solution to check the functionality of a sensor that operates at 120 RPM and outputs a 24V signal. Participants explore various circuit designs, potential output indicators, and the feasibility of building a device to monitor the sensor's performance continuously.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a device to check a sensor outputting a 24V signal at 120 RPM, ideally a DIY circuit.
  • Questions arise about the nature of the output: whether it is a sine wave or a pulse train, with clarification that it is a pulse train of 24V peak pulses.
  • Another participant suggests the need for tolerances on the pulse train's amplitude and frequency to determine when the sensor is deemed non-functional.
  • There is a proposal for a battery-powered device that would indicate sensor functionality based on the output voltage range of 18 to 24V.
  • One idea involves using an audio output to detect missing pulses, while another suggests an LED indicator for missed pulses.
  • A more detailed circuit design is proposed, involving a timer, counter, and comparator to monitor the pulse train and trigger an LED if pulses are missed.
  • Participants express varying levels of expertise, with some requesting more detailed circuit designs and others considering simpler alternatives.
  • Discussion includes the possibility of drawing power from the pulse train and the sensor's capability to drive a load.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for a device to monitor the sensor's output, but there are multiple competing views on the best approach to design the circuit and the specifics of the output indicators. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the final circuit design and implementation details.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the output impedance of the sensor and the feasibility of powering the monitoring device from the sensor's output. There are also unresolved questions about the tolerances for the pulse train that would indicate a malfunction.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
I am looking for a cheap device to check sensor function, the sensor is detecting at 120
rpm and should give a 24v output.
If there is a circuit i could build my self that would be great.

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you saying that the output is a 120*60 = 7200Hz sine wave at 24Vrms? Or does it put out a pulse train of 24V peak pulses at 7200Hz? Do you have a DVM with a simple frequency counter in it (my Fluke handheld has a low-frequency counter capability)?
 
berkeman said:
Are you saying that the output is a 120*60 = 7200Hz sine wave at 24Vrms? Or does it put out a pulse train of 24V peak pulses at 7200Hz? Do you have a DVM with a simple frequency counter in it (my Fluke handheld has a low-frequency counter capability)?

Hi berkerman, it is a train of 24v peak pulses, i do not want to leave an expensive meter coupled to this circuit for fear of damage, environmental and human, i need to look at this sensor to rule it out as the cause for a glitch a glich that has gone by the time a meter is set up.
 
Okay, got it. You want to leave the detecting circuit in-place, not just use it for spot checks.

What would be considered not working? What are the tolerances on an okay pulse train, in terms of amplitude and frequency? At what point do you want the detecting circuit to call the output no-good? Are you planning on battery powering this detector thing, or do you have wall power available? Or do you want it self-powered on the 24V pulse train, and it just keeps an LED lit if the sensor is putting out a pulse train within tolerances?
 
As long as the sensor is puting out a 18 to 24v signal and not missing any the sensor would be deemed okay, a battery powered device would be ideal.
 
How about a simple audio output? You could cut off the bottom parts of the pulses and drive a small speaker with the 7.2kHz audio pulses. The ear might be able to hear if there are any consistently missing pulses or whatever the various failure mechanisms are. Don't know if having a continuous audio output would be too obnoxious, though. Are you looking more for an LED indicator?

Also, how many pulses have to be missing before you light a trouble light? Or is it the frequency changing that you want to alarm? This is all do-able, I'm just trying to get an understanding of how complex it will need to be.
 
I think an LED would be best, say it lights if any pulse is missed, this semsor forms a sort of (and) circuit, the logic and hard wear have been in use for years but now it will have a train of (misses) one day and be okay for may be a week.
 
Okay, then the easiest way would be to use a timer to time the period between pulses, and if that timer goes above some set count, it trips the circuit that lights the LED.

So the first part of the circuit would decrease the amplitude of the signal down to logic levels, and make a trigger signal from each pulse which was 18V to 24V in amplitude. That would be fed into the reset input of a free-running counter, so that the counter never reached the alarm count (which it would if a single pulse were missing, or some number of pulses in a row, depending on how you want to configure it). The alarm count would trigger a flip-flop, which would light the LED. The whole circuit can be reset with a single pushbutton, to reset the counter and turn off the LED.

Does that give you enough to build it, or do you want some more details on how you can make it? I'd start with a 74HC4060 counter IC, with maybe a 5MHz crystal on it, to give you a nominal count of about 5MHz/7.2kHz = 695, and you could use the 1024 count output to trigger the alarm LED flip-flop. Divide down your input pulses with a resistor divider, and run that into a comparator circuit that looks for the 18V minimum equivalent voltage level. The comparator output would feed the reset of the 74HC4060. The whole thing should be able to run off of a 9V battery for a fairly long time (use a low-current LED...).
 
I would much appreciate some detail i am not at a level where i can design a circuit,
building will not be a problem though.
Thanks berkerman.
 
  • #10
wolram said:
I would much appreciate some detail i am not at a level where i can design a circuit,
building will not be a problem though.
Thanks berkerman.

I'll sketch something when I get a chance, wolram. It might be the weekend though. I'll also think about simpler circuits that might do the job -- less accurate, and might require turning a knob to tune the sensing frequency or something. Any chance we can draw power from the pulse train? We wouldn't need much. What's the output impedance of the sensor?
 
  • #11
berkeman said:
I'll sketch something when I get a chance, wolram. It might be the weekend though. I'll also think about simpler circuits that might do the job -- less accurate, and might require turning a knob to tune the sensing frequency or something. Any chance we can draw power from the pulse train? We wouldn't need much. What's the output impedance of the sensor?

The sensor can drive a load, from memory it will power a 1 watt solonoid coil.
Thanks for the help berkerman.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K