Verifying Physics Answers for Students

  • Thread starter Thread starter barthayn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics students
AI Thread Summary
Studying physics at the university level requires effective methods for verifying answers. Unlike mathematics, where alternative methods can confirm results, physics often relies on logical reasoning to assess the plausibility of answers. Utilizing examples, such as the unrealistic scenario of carrying 800 kg of gold, can help gauge whether a solution makes sense. Additionally, checking units and working backwards are practical techniques for validating results. Understanding these strategies is essential for success in physics studies.
barthayn
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I am most likely to study physics next year in university. I hope to obtain a major in physics. However, I noticed when I was studying it in high school that I had no idea how to check my answers, mathematically, to see if they were correct. How does one do this? I ask this because I know what I will get on my mathematics tests because I can verify it with a different method, but I have no idea with physics.

As well, thanks to everyone who helped me last year with physics. It was greatly needed :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In working (be it in physics or math) with problems you do the usual i.e. you analyze the problem, solve it using the right tool and check if your answers are right. In physics what works most in checking answers is logic. Just be logical, you would ask "Does my answer sound right?" I can remember Young and Freedman's University Physics has tips on solving problems. It has an example there like: A robber tries to steal a 20 million dollar worth of gold bars (not sure of the numbers here) and put it in his bag. If you buy a gram of gold it would be worth around say 25 dollars so for a USD 20 M he would have to carry 800 kg of gold bars. That is very unrealistic!

Also when you study in the university, you just don't have to work on problems by just subtituting numbers. You work with derivation (I like these stuffs) of equations. To check your answers, one common way is by checking with the units.

Of cource checking by working backwards is still a good way.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top