MHB Checking My Solution to Problem 2(c) of Problem Set 2.1: Seeking Critique

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book: Rings and Their Modules and am currently focused on Section 2.1 Direct Products and Direct Sums ... ...

I need someone to check my solution to Problem 2(c) of Problem Set 2.1 ...

Problem 2(c) of Problem Set 2.1 reads as follows:View attachment 8061My attempt at a solution follows:We claim that $$\bigoplus_\Delta R_\alpha$$ is a right ideal of $$\prod_\Delta R_\alpha$$ Proof ... Let $$(x_\alpha ) , (y_\alpha ) \in \bigoplus_\Delta R_\alpha$$ and let $$(r_\alpha ) \in \prod_\Delta R_\alpha$$Then $$ (x_\alpha ) + (y_\alpha ) = (x_\alpha + y_\alpha )$$ ... by the rule of addition in direct products ...Now ... $$x_\alpha + y_\alpha \in R_\alpha$$ for all $$\alpha \in \Delta$$ ... by closure of addition in rings ... Thus $$(x_\alpha + y_\alpha ) \in \prod_\Delta R_\alpha$$ ...... but also ... since $$(x_\alpha $$) and $$(y_\alpha )$$ each have only a finite number of non-zero components ...

... we have that $$(x_\alpha + y_\alpha )$$ has only a finite number of non-zero components ...

... so ... $$(x_\alpha + y_\alpha ) \in \bigoplus_\Delta R_\alpha$$ ...

Hence $$(x_\alpha ) + (y_\alpha ) \in \bigoplus_\Delta R_\alpha $$ ... ... ... ... ... (1)
Now we also have that ... $$(x_\alpha ) (r_\alpha ) = (x_\alpha r_\alpha)$$ ... ... rule of multiplication in a direct product ...

Now ... $$x_\alpha r_\alpha \in R_\alpha$$ for all $$\alpha \in \Delta$$ ... since a ring is closed under multiplication ...

and ...

$$(x_\alpha r_\alpha)$$ has only a finite number of non-zero components since $$(x_\alpha )$$ has only a finite number of non-zero components ...

So ... $$(x_\alpha r_\alpha) \in \bigoplus_\Delta R_\alpha$$

$$\Longrightarrow (x_\alpha) (r_\alpha) \in \bigoplus_\Delta R_\alpha$$ ... ... ... ... ... (2)
$$(1) (2) \Longrightarrow$$ $$\bigoplus_\Delta R_\alpha$$ is a right ideal of $$\prod_\Delta R_\alpha$$
Can someone please critique my proof ... ... and either confirm its correctness or point out the errors and shortcomings ...

Such help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is correct, Peter.
You can also say: $R_\alpha$ is a right ideal of $R_\alpha$, then apply (b).
But you forgot something.

(c) asked is $\bigoplus_\Delta R_\alpha$ an ideal of $\prod_\Delta R_\alpha$ ?

So you have to prove that $\bigoplus_\Delta R_\alpha$ a two-sided ideal of $\prod_\Delta R_\alpha$
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top