Chem 1 thermochemistry problem? Am I doing this right?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the heat released when 5.00 g of aluminum reacts with chlorine, first convert grams of aluminum to moles using its molar mass. Then, apply the enthalpy change (delta H) of -1408.4 kJ for the reaction of 2 moles of Al. Since the reaction involves 2 moles of Al, divide the delta H by 2 to find the heat released per mole. Finally, multiply the heat per mole by the number of moles of aluminum from your conversion. This approach accurately determines the heat released in the reaction.
land_of_ice
Messages
136
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When aluminum reacts with chlorine
how much heat in KJ is released on reaction of 5.00 g of Al
for the following reaction:
2AL (s) + 3 CL2(g) ----->2AlCl3 (s)
delta h = -1408.4



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Is it right if you start multiplying the delta H by the number of grams of Al , and by doing that by first converting grams of Al to moles? It's hard to tell you if you would divide by 2 at all? 2Al has something to do with it maybe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it this way - you are given amount of heat evolving per 2 moles of Al reacting.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Chemistry Thermochemistry and the heat of complete combustion
Replies
4
Views
2K
Chemistry How do we use enthalpy of formation in this calculation?
Replies
9
Views
2K
Lewis structure and thermochemistry problems
Replies
3
Views
3K
How to calculate heat from enthelpy of reaction
Replies
5
Views
2K
How much heat is evolved Thermochemistry Question
Replies
3
Views
24K
Where Did I Go Wrong Balancing This Single Displacement Reaction?
Replies
2
Views
2K
[CHEM] Simple stoichiometry problem help
Replies
5
Views
8K
Thermochemistry Problems: How Do I Solve These Two Heat Release Calculations?
Replies
1
Views
5K
What Did I Do Wrong in Finding the Percent Yield of Alum?
Replies
9
Views
10K
What am I doing wrong? Thermochemistry
Replies
4
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top