[Chem] Balancing Redox Eqn Any Diff from Regular?

AI Thread Summary
Balancing redox equations differs from regular equations due to the need to account for changes in oxidation states. The oxidation numbers do not remain equal on both sides; rather, the total increase and decrease in oxidation numbers must balance. The Ion-Electron method is recommended for redox reactions, where the reaction is split into oxidation and reduction halves. Each half is balanced for elements (excluding hydrogen and oxygen), followed by balancing oxygen and hydrogen, and finally ensuring charge balance. This method helps clarify the electron transfer involved in the reaction.
dt_
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Balance this redox equation.

Homework Equations



Ag + H^{+} + NO_{3} ^{-} \rightarrow Ag^{+} + H_{2}O + NO


The Attempt at a Solution



Using a conventional balancing mechanism I got these coefficients:

1 + 8 + 2 -> 1 + 4 + 2

but the correct answer according to the text is:

3 + 4 + 1 -> 3 + 2 + 1

I am guessing my answer is wrong because of something to do with the oxidation numbers... but what exactly is the problem? Are the oxidation numbers for each of the elements supposed to remain the same on both sides of the eqn? Are they supposed to change? My last chem class was a couple years ago so I don't quite remember :)

Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No.Oxidation no. shoudnt be equal but the increase/decrease ratio of ON has to be equal.TO escape from this increase/decrease thing we use another way of balancing called ION ELECTRON method. IN this we break the reaction into 2 halves : Oxidation and reduction. Then we balance the elemets(apart from H and O) and then balance O and then lastly H.We have to balance charges and also multiply the 2 equations with suitable coeffecients so that the electrons you have added(to make charge equal) cancel out.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top