Schools Chem Research for Physics Grad School

AI Thread Summary
Engaging in non-physics research, such as organic chemistry, can still be valuable for undergraduate physics majors, especially when opportunities in their primary field are unavailable. Graduate programs often prioritize strong recommendation letters from research supervisors over those from classroom instructors, making a positive reference from an organic chemist beneficial. Broad research experience can enhance a candidate's profile, demonstrating versatility and a willingness to explore interdisciplinary fields. While it’s important to seek opportunities aligned with future academic goals, enjoying the work and receiving solid recommendations can significantly impact graduate school applications.
Mike K
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
I am a undergraduate physics major currently researching in a astrophysics lab. My PI is away this summer, so I will be unable to research with him between spring and fall semesters. However, I found an opportunity to do work with an organic chemistry group that I suspect I will enjoy (I enjoyed orgo having taken it while I was still a premed).

While the lab explores some subjects related to quantum physics, for the most part I would not be exploring subjects relevant to my future in physics/grad school.

Is this opportunity still worthwhile? How will graduate programs view doing non-physics research, or potentially having a recommendation from an organic chemist?

I still have plenty of time to find a physics group I would enjoy working for, but I also do not doubt I will like this position.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd stay the course. If you have a good recommendation from your astrophysics job, some organic chem research won't hurt. Broad based experience is not bad, especially if all the faculty you work for write good recommendation letters for you.

Letters from research supervisors mean more than from classroom teachers.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top