Chemical Kinetics - Activation Energy and gr

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around problems 12 and 13 from a chemical kinetics problem set, with a participant sharing that they calculated the rate constant k for problem 12 as 1.54*10^-4. They express difficulty with problem 13, indicating a lack of understanding of the relevant concepts covered in a recent lecture. Assistance is requested for problem 14, which involves determining the rate law and rate constant using provided data and applying the Arrhenius equation. The integrated rate laws for zero, first, and second order reactions are suggested as helpful for problem 13. The urgency of the assignment's deadline is noted, emphasizing the need for timely help.
ananya1995
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The problems are Number 12 and 13 on this link
http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1096438.files/PS4.pdf

I have the value of k for sum number 12, it is 1.54*10^-4.

Im completely stuck with number 13 cos I'm unfamiliar with that concept and it kinda went over my head in lecture this morning.

If anyone wants to help with 14, it would be appreciated :D

The problem set is due in like 10 hours, so no pressure xD
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the integrated rate law for 0th,1st,2nd order might help for problem 13.
for q.14 use first two data to find the rate law and rate constant.
then using arrhenious equation and the third data find rate constant at 650K.
use the integrated form of rate law to find the required time.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top