Chemical kinetics diagramm -> chemical equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around interpreting three chemical kinetics diagrams to derive general chemical equations. The user has successfully formulated an equation for the third diagram, suggesting a sequence of reactions with varying rates, specifically that k2 is significantly larger than k1 due to the low energy of intermediates. However, they express uncertainty regarding the first two diagrams, particularly with the roles of four reactants and the potential reversibility of reactions. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on the reaction sequences, especially the timing of peaks for the second and third substances. Overall, the user seeks confirmation and guidance on their interpretations and the relationships between the reactants.
Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

Homework Statement



I got the three different diagramms (attached below) and I shall find a general chemical equation for all of them.



Homework Equations



-


The Attempt at a Solution



I think I know how to do the third one, but I have troubles with the first and second one, because I have four different reactants. My thoughts for the third one are the following:

blue \xrightarrow{k_{1}} red \xrightarrow{k_{2}} yellow

whereas k2 is far bigger than k1 because the intermediates curve is low, which says that it reacts fast.

Can anyone approve this? Furthermore I need some hints for the first and second one. I'm absoulety not sure if I have something like red+yellow ->green or something like red->yellow->green

Thank you for your help in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Diagramm.JPG
    Diagramm.JPG
    28.4 KB · Views: 574
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like in the first case green is still produced long after all red disappeared, so b->r->y->g looks the most logical. I am not so sure about the second. Could be r<->y is easily reversible.
 
The first and the last in the series are evident I hope, so the only problem is the middle two.

I can't see any way the second substance in the reaction sequence wouldn't peak before the third, can you?

For Borek's suggestion of reversibility, if by that he means the second an third substance are in rapid equilibrium then they would peak at the same time, in fact the two curves would be identical when one is multiplied by the right factor.
 
Thanks to both of you, I think I understood it now a bit better.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top