Are These Chemical Reaction Review Answers Correct

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blockmeister
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chem Review
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a user seeking validation for their answers to chemical reaction review questions. They express uncertainty about their responses and question whether a specific reaction is missing an arrow, indicating a potential oversight in the reaction representation. Multiple links to images of the questions are provided for reference. Participants in the thread are expected to analyze the provided images and offer feedback on the correctness of the answers. The focus remains on clarifying the accuracy of chemical reaction representations and answers.
Blockmeister
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Im trying to solve these review questions but am second guessing my answers.
http://puu.sh/aKk5W/9695c07739.png
http://puu.sh/aKk6y/903fceeb2d.png
http://puu.sh/aKkgV/74580ed488.png
http://puu.sh/aKkKm/3c1e9d1544.png
http://puu.sh/aKkN4/acf042c92b.png
http://puu.sh/aKkPl/638f4ce2a5.png
http://puu.sh/aKkQ9/7ad88fe729.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Blockmeister said:

Homework Statement



Im trying to solve these review questions but am second guessing my answers.
http://puu.sh/aKk5W/9695c07739.png

This one was posted twice. And I wonder if the reaction is not missing →.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top