Chemical versus nuclear reaction in charcoal

AI Thread Summary
Charcoal, primarily composed of carbon, can yield potassium and sodium compounds when heated due to the presence of these elements in the original plant material. Charcoal is the result of partially burned plant matter, which retains minerals like sodium, potassium, and magnesium. The discussion clarifies that no nuclear reactions are involved in this process. Additionally, the smell of ammonia noted during the decomposition of charcoal may arise from the type of charcoal used; cooking charcoal typically does not emit this odor, while activated charcoal, especially when previously used for filtration, can produce such smells. The conversation also touches on the potential for separating sodium and potassium oxides from the charcoal.
JGM_14
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
From my experience one cannot under go a nuclear reaction of a material by heat alone, so why does charcoal, which all i have heard is carbon, yeild potassium and sodium compounds when heated? :mad:
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Charcoal is the partially burned or charred remains of plant material. Plants contain sodium and potassium and so does the charcoal and so does the ash. You will probably find magnesium oxide in there as well.
No nuclear reaction here.
 
I have another related question. how could i separate the sodium and potassium oxides? I have many times noticed the smell of ammonia when decomposing charcoal what is this from?
 
It depends what the charcoal was used for. Cooking charcoal should not smell like that. Activated charcoal can smell like that, especially if it has been used to filter an aquarium.
 
the charcoal was from charring plant remains then furthur decomposing them with a strong heat
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top