Chemistry: A titration of ethylamine with HCl.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the pH during the titration of 50 mL of 0.150 M ethylamine with 0.100 M HCl. For part a, the challenge lies in determining the pH after adding 10 mL more HCl than needed, which involves understanding limiting reagents. Part b requires applying the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation to find the pH when 75% of the required acid has been added. The given Ka value for ethylamine is 2.34 x 10^-4, which is essential for these calculations. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of titration calculations and the application of relevant equations.
sondawg
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For the titration of 50 mL of 0.150 M ethylamine (C2H5NH2), with 0.100 M HCl, find the pH :
a) when 10 mL more of HCl has been added than is required
b) when 75% of the required acid has been added

Homework Equations


Maybe Henderson Hasselbalch?: pH = pKa + log (base/acid)
Ka = 2.34*10^-4

The Attempt at a Solution


I honestly do not know where to go with this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I managed to solve most of the problem by now, just can't get the two parts still in the question.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top