Chemistry - acids, bases, equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
To compute the pH of a neutral aqueous solution at a temperature where Kw is 3.49e-13, the equation Kw = [H+][OH-] is applied. Assuming [H+] equals [OH-] in a neutral solution, the concentration of hydrogen ions is calculated as [H+] = 3.49e-6. The pH is then determined using the formula pH = -log[H+], resulting in a pH of approximately 5.457. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between Kw and pH, highlighting that Kw varies with temperature. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving equilibrium problems in chemistry.
ArcadianGenesis
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Like all equilibrium constants, Kw varies somewhat with temperature. Given that Kw is 3.49e-13 at some temperature, compute the pH of a neutral aqueous solution at that temperature.

Homework Equations


Kw = [H+][OH-]
pH = -log[H+]

The Attempt at a Solution


3.49e-13 = [H+]*10e-7
[H+] = 3.49e-6
pH = 5.457
 
Physics news on Phys.org
remember Kw is the ionproduct of water at a given temperature. So {H+}*{OH-}= 3.49e-13 next {H+}*{OH-} can be seen as {H+}e2 so what to do next to gain {H+} from Kw?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top