Chemistry: Activation Energy (Arrhenius equation)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rate change of a chemical reaction with an activation energy of 64.5 kJ/mole when the temperature increases from 25.0°C to 50.0°C using the Arrhenius equation. The relevant equation is ln(k2/k1) = Ea/R (1/T1 - 1/T2), where k represents the reaction rate constants at the two temperatures. The activation energy is converted to joules, and temperatures are expressed in Kelvin for accurate calculations. The final relationship shows that the reaction rate at 50°C is significantly faster than at 25°C, specifically by a factor derived from the exponential function of the activation energy and temperature difference. This highlights the impact of temperature on reaction kinetics.
lonelyassassin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A certain reaction, with an activation energe of 64.5 kJ/mole, is run at 25.0'C (degree Celsius) and its rate is measured. How many times faster would this reaction be if it were run at 50.0'C (degree Celsius)?


Homework Equations



I think: (Arrhenius equation)
ln(k1/k2) = Ea/R (1/T2 - 1/T1)

R = 8.314 J/mole*K


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know where to start. Only Ea = 64.5 kJ/mole, 1 temperature = 25.0'C and R (8.314 J/mole*K) are given. I don't know where to get the other numbers to plug in the equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
remember, you also have a T2 (50degC). You don't necessarily need to solve for the individual k values, just figure out a relationship between them.
 
i just did this problem on my homework

we have ln( k2/k1 ) = (Ea/R) * (1/T1 - 1/T2)

where k is the reaction constant, Ea is activation energy, R is gas constant, T is temperature

what are we solving for? well we want to see how k changes. we rearrange the equation:

[antilog of both sides]
k2/k1 = antilog[ (Ea/R) * (1/T1 - 1/T2) ]
[multiple by k1 on each side]
k2 = k1 * antilog[ (Ea/R) * (1/T1 - 1/T2) ]
[antilog(x) just means e^(x)]
k2 = k1 * e^[ (Ea/R) * (1/T1 - 1/T2) ]

here we go! we wanted to see how k changes right? the new k (k2) value equals the old k (k1) value times e^[ (Ea/R) * (1/T1 - 1/T2) ]

the reason it was tricky is because we weren't solving for a variable, we just wanted to see how k would change when the temperature changed

so the answer is: when the temperature is 50C, it is ((( e^[ (Ea/R) * (1/T1 - 1/T2) ] ))) times faster than when it is at 25C

just plug and chug:

Ea = 64.5kj/mol = 64500 j/mol
T1 = 25*C = 298K
T2 = 50*C = 323K
R = 8.314 J/mole*K
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top