Chemistry, Equilibrium Constant Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the amount of NaOH needed to create a buffer solution with a pH of 7.80 from 500.0 mL of 0.70 M HClO. The initial amount of HClO is 0.35 moles, and the reaction with NaOH produces the conjugate base ClO-. Using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, the required ratio of base to acid is determined to be 2.19. The calculation shows that 0.240 moles of NaOH must be added to achieve the desired buffer composition. The thread concludes with a request for clarification on the initial question and the findings.
jaguar7
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Haha --- nvm, found it. Sorry/Thanks... ^_^

Where does the 2.19 come from?

How many moles of NaOH would need to be added to 500.0 mL of 0.70 M HClO to create a buffer with a pH of 7.80?

Initially, we have 0.35 mol of HClO. We are going to add NaOH which will react with the weak acid to create the conjugate weak base.

HClO + OH- → H2O + ClO-It is this weak base we’ll need to have for the buffer. First, let’s find the ratio of the weak base to the weak acid using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:

7.80 = -log(3.5*10^(-8) + log(base/acid)

base/acid = 2.19

Since we will be making base from the weak acid, we will react x moles of OH-. So after the reaction takes place, we have 0.35 – x moles of acid and x moles of base.

x / (0.35 - x) = 2.19

x = 0.240 moles
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Won't hurt if you will explain what you were asking for and what you have found. I guess I can guess, not so sure about others.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top