Chemistry Equilibrium Partial Pressures

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the total pressure in a closed vessel containing PCl5 at equilibrium, using the equilibrium constant Kc and the ideal gas law. The user initially calculated Kp and attempted to apply the small x approximation to simplify the equilibrium expression. Despite following the correct steps, the user arrived at a total pressure of 4.935 atm, which is significantly higher than the expected 4.09 atm. The key issue raised is whether the value of x (2.3517) justifies the use of the small x approximation, suggesting a potential error in this assumption. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying assumptions in equilibrium calculations to ensure accurate results.
Madelin Pierce
Messages
24
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Kc = 4.15 x 10-2 at 356°C for PCl5(g) ↔ PCl3(g) + Cl2(g). A closed 2.00 L vessel initially contians 0.100 mol PCl5. Calculate the total pressure in the vessel (in atm to 2 decimal places) at 356°C when equilibrium is achieved.

Homework Equations


PV=nRT
Kp= Kc(RT)^change in n
Kp= Pressure products/pressure reactants
Small x approximation

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer key says 4.09 for Ptotal, but I keep getting a wrong answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show how you arrive at the wrong answer then.
 
Borek said:
Show how you arrive at the wrong answer then.
I use the equation Kp=Kc(RT)^change in n. I plug in Kp=(.0415)(.08206)(629.15)^1= 2.1425.
Then, I solve for PV=nRT for PCl5: P(2.00L)=(.100mol)(.08206)(629.15K), equaling 2.5814atm. I use Kp= Products/Reactants which is 2.1425=x^2/(2.5814-x) where the Xs are from an ice table. I was told by my instructor to use small x approximation for this problem, so I eliminated the x on the bottom, so 2.1425*2.5814= x^2. Times them and square root and I got 2.3517 for X. Plugged Ptotal=P(PCl5)+P(PCl3)+P(Cl2) which equaled 4.935 for total pressure. I don’t know how I’m not getting the answer right, I just don’t. The answer’s supposed to be 4.09 Ptotal.
 
You got 2.3517 for x - does it justify the small x approximation?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top