Chemistry: Finding Ksp for Ca(OH)2

  • Thread starter Thread starter madeeeeee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Ksp
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the concentration of hydroxide ions at equilibrium in a solution containing sodium hydroxide and calcium chloride. The Ksp value for calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) is given as 6.10 x 10^-6. The reaction produces calcium ions and hydroxide ions, with the concentration of calcium remaining significant due to excess calcium chloride. To find the hydroxide concentration, the equilibrium concentrations of calcium and hydroxide must be considered, factoring in the precipitation of Ca(OH)2. The approach involves using the Ksp value and the remaining calcium concentration to calculate the hydroxide concentration, ensuring that stoichiometric assumptions are validated.
madeeeeee
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the concentration of hydroxide at equilibrium in a solution that contains a mixture of .10 M sodium hydroxide and .20 M calcium chloride?

I know that the reference value for Ca(OH)2 is 6.10 x 10^-6

Equation: 2NaOH(aq) + CaCl2(aq) ---> 2NaCl(aq) + Ca(OH)2(s)

Ca(OH)2(s)----> Ca + 2OH
I -
C -
E -
Ksp = [Ca][OH]2

precipitate:
Ca: 0.20M x (1/2) = .10 M
OH: .10M x (1/2) = .05 M

My question is, is that what is the volume of the concentrations? Because i don't know how to solve this problem, please help! I have tried different ways but i keep getting a cubed root...I am really confused!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may assume any volume you like - like 1L - if it helps you. But you don't have to.

There is an excess of calcium, so when the reaction ends you will have still a lot of calcium in the solution. Calculate its concentration, and use it to calculate concentration of OH- that was not precipitated. This is only an approximated method, but good enough.
 
How do I do that? Do I say Ca: .10 M + x
OH: .05 M + 2x

do I disassociate the x?
 
Not +x, but -x - Ca(OH)2 precipitates, so both Ca2+ and OH- are removed.

But the idea is to not use 0.05-2x - but to calculate how much Ca2+ was removed from the solution by precipitation assuming reaction went to completion. This is not exactly true, but knowing Ksp and [Ca2+] you can calculate [OH-] and check if the assumption makes sense (that is, if amount of OH- left in the solution is negligible in stoichiometry calculations).
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top