Chemistry: titration of an unknown amino acid

AI Thread Summary
To determine the concentration of the unknown amino acid, the student titrated 10.00 mL of the solution with 0.1521 M NaOH and 0.0986 M HCl, using 18.61 mL and 3.28 mL, respectively. The key equation M1V1 = M2V2 was applied, but the student encountered discrepancies in the calculated amino acid concentration. It's important to consider the reactions occurring during titration with both strong acid and base, as the amino acid exists in both protonated (A) and deprotonated (A-) forms. Understanding these reactions is crucial for accurate concentration calculations. The discussion emphasizes the need to analyze the titration data carefully to resolve the concentration issue.
superbnchic
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A student titrated 10.00-mL aliquots of her unknown amino acid solution with standard 0.1521M NaOH (18.61mL) and with 0.0986M HCl (3.28mL). Calculate the concentration of the amino acid. Assume the amino acid contains both the A & A- forms of the amino acid.


Homework Equations


M1V1=M2V2


The Attempt at a Solution


I used the above equation but got different M1 for the amino acid concentration.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You wre already given a hint in the question - you start with a mixture of two forms of aminoacid. Think what reactions take place when you titrate with strong acid and with strong base.

--
methods
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top