Chemistry: would someone verify my work, please?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjoyful
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a chemistry homework problem involving the calculation of nitrogen percentage and mass produced from burning coal represented by the formula C135H96O9NS. The calculations show that the percent of nitrogen by mass in the coal is approximately 0.734%. When three tons of coal are burned, it is determined that 42.8 kg of NO would be produced, assuming complete conversion of nitrogen in the coal. Clarifications are provided regarding whether the final figure represents nitrogen alone or the total mass of NO, emphasizing the need to express results in appropriate units. The calculations are confirmed as correct, and the importance of understanding the composition of NO is highlighted.
bjoyful
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assume that coal can be represented by the formula C135H96O9NS. A. What is the percent of nitrogen by mass in this coal? B. If three tons of coal were burned completely, what mass of nitrogen in NO would be produced? (Assume that all of the nitrogen in the coal is converted to NO in the burning process.) Be sure to show all your calculation work in each case.

The Attempt at a Solution



A.135x12.01=1621.35 (carbon) + 96x1.008=96.76 (hydrogen) + 9x16.00=144 (oxygen) + 1x14.01=14.01 (nitrogen) + 1x32.07=32.07 (sulfur) = 1908.19. 14.01x100/1908.19= 0.734%.

B.First, to find the moles of coal in 6000lbs of coal, I converted the pounds to grams and divided it by the mole weight (6000 x 453.6 / 1908.19 = 1426.27). Since one mole of coal provides one mole of NO, there are 1426 moles of coal and 1426 moles of Nitrogen. NO has a molar mass of 30g/mol, so 30g/mol x 1426 moles = 42.8kg of NO. Therefore, the mass of nitrogen in NO that would be produced when three tons of coal is burned completely is 42kg. (Am I including both nitrogen and oxygen in this figure? I'm only suppose to be looking for nitrogen??)

I want to make sure I have done this right. If not, please point me in the right direction:)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So you've got 42.8 kg of NO. They want to know how much of this is nitrogen.
 
Is 42.8kg the correct number of NO? Is there a formula to use to find how much of this is N?
 
I've checked your work and it seems that that is the correct answer.

Think about 1 mol of NO. What percent of this (in terms of mass) is nitrogen?
 
The question asks you for the mass of NO, not N. Relax, you have it. You might want to express it in either tons or pounds for completeness.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top