Chiral symmetry and quark condensate

Einj
Messages
464
Reaction score
59
I'm studying chiral symmetry in QCD. I understand that in order for a spontaneous symmetry breaking to occur, there must be some state with a vacuum expectation value different from zero. My question is: can someone prove that is the chiral symmetry is an exact symmetry of the QCD then necessarily:

$$\langle 0 | \bar{\psi}\psi |0\rangle = 0$$

In understand that this has to be derived from the invariance of the vacuum but I can't prove it explicitely.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Einj said:
I'm studying chiral symmetry in QCD. I understand that in order for a spontaneous symmetry breaking to occur, there must be some state with a vacuum expectation value different from zero. My question is: can someone prove that is the chiral symmetry is an exact symmetry of the QCD then necessarily:

$$\langle 0 | \bar{\psi}\psi |0\rangle = 0$$

In understand that this has to be derived from the invariance of the vacuum but I can't prove it explicitely.

Thanks

It's actually easy to see that \langle 0 | \bar{\psi}\psi |0\rangle is not invariant under chiral symmetry. For QCD with one flavor,

\psi = \begin{pmatrix} u \\ d \end{pmatrix},

where we can consider the up and down quarks u,d as Dirac spinors. Then we can write the chiral symmetry as

\psi \rightarrow \exp\left[i\gamma^5 \left( \vec{\theta}\cdot\vec{\tau}\right) \right] \psi,

where the \vec{\tau} are the generators of SU(2) flavor transformations.

Some algebra will show that the kinetic term \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu\partial_\mu \psi is chiral invariant, but \bar{\psi} \psi is not, because the \gamma^5 in the chiral transformation anticommutes with the factor of \gamma^0 in the Dirac conjugate.
 
Ok, I knew that. Actually my question was a little bit different (or maybe it's the same thing but I can't see it :-p). I was asking: IF the theory is invariant under chiral symmetry (i.e. the vacuum state is invariant) how can I show that necessarily \langle \bar{\psi}\psi\rangle=0??
 
Einj said:
Ok, I knew that. Actually my question was a little bit different (or maybe it's the same thing but I can't see it :-p). I was asking: IF the theory is invariant under chiral symmetry (i.e. the vacuum state is invariant) how can I show that necessarily \langle \bar{\psi}\psi\rangle=0??

Zero is the only value that is invariant under the chiral symmetry. You can be as explicit as you like by picking a one-parameter transformation and using the u,d parameterization. Show that, if \rho = \langle \bar{\psi}\psi\rangle_0, then \delta\rho \neq 0 unless \rho =0.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top