Choose Chem E or Aerospace? High School Senior's Decision

  • Thread starter Thread starter EnterTheLine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aerospace Chem
AI Thread Summary
A high school senior is contemplating their college major, initially applying for Aerospace Engineering but now considering Chemical Engineering due to a newfound interest in chemistry. They aim to integrate both fields by focusing on Aerospace materials, specifically polymers and composites. The student is leaning towards a major in Chemical Engineering with a concentration in Polymer Engineering, followed by a master's in Aerospace. Recommendations suggest starting with Chemical Engineering, as it may provide a stronger chemistry foundation and facilitate a smoother transition to Aerospace if needed. However, concerns are raised about the feasibility of moving from a Chemical Engineering background to an Aerospace master's program, highlighting the importance of consulting a guidance counselor for tailored advice and exploring university-specific transition programs.
EnterTheLine
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm a high school senior, making my college decision in the next month or two. I applied to schools as an Aerospace engineering major, but I'm really enjoying my AP chemistry class and leaning towards Chem E as a major now. However, I do not wish to totally abandon aerospace, so I was thinking I could work on Aerospace materials, in specific polymers and composite materials. Would it be more advantageous to Chem E major, than major in Aerospace? I want to get an education in both disciplines, as I do not want to be ignorant in one topic or another.
I'm currently leaning towards Majoring in Chem E with a concentration in Polymer engineering, then get master's in Aerospace. Would this make sense? Recommendations are appreciated for what my course of action should be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I were you, I would start out as a chem engineer. I don't know how your school does it, but at A&M, freshman chem engineers are required to take more extensive chemistry courses that aerospace would simply ignore. If you can't hack chem engineering, or get yearnings for aerospace again, it's easier to change majors from chem to aero than aero to chem -- and you'd be well on your way to a chemistry minor.

Oh, and as far as grad school plans, I would definitely talk that over with a guidance counsellor. Most universities have special programs that allow you to transition the way you expressed interest in. I don't believe I've heard of anyone going from a chem engineering foundation to an aerospace masters (the disciplines are very different), so I wouldn't bet on it.
 
ok great. Thanks
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top