Schools Choosing a Research Focus in Grad School: Tips for Physics and Math Majors

AI Thread Summary
A recent physics and math graduate is contemplating graduate school but is uncertain about their research interests, particularly in theoretical particle physics. They express difficulty in understanding advanced research papers, questioning if this is typical for someone coming from an undergraduate background. The discussion suggests that pursuing a Master's degree could be beneficial for gaining clarity on research interests before committing to a Ph.D. However, concerns are raised about the rarity of funded Master's programs in the U.S. and their limited impact on job prospects. It is recommended that the individual consider applying directly to Ph.D. programs at institutions with diverse research areas that align with their interests, as this may provide better opportunities for funding and exploration within the field of physics.
estedrich
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am a recently-graduated physics and math major, looking to go back to grad school after a couple years off. I am having trouble choosing a graduate school to attend, because I am uncertain of my research interests. I took a couple graduate-level classes (QM and Particle Physics), and found these to be the most interesting classes that I took. This does not lead me to conlcude that I should research either of these topics, though, but rather that I am more interested in topics that I study at a graduate level. That being said, how do I go about deciding which area interests me most? I think I would like to go into theoretical particle physics, for example, so I go to the U of Colorado, Boulder Physics page to scan through the various research areas. One professor interests me, so I take a look at his recent publications - maybe I should try to learn more to see if it really does interest me. But the title of the publication is "CKM and Tri-bimaximal MNS Matrices in a SU(5) x(d)T Model." I can't understand the title, so I don't even bother trying to understand the paper itself. Is this normal? Or should I be able to understand that, coming out of undergrad?
I did do research in undergrad, but it was an experimental cosmology experiment, and I would rather not continue in that.
Should I read papers in journals, or are they all going to be along that vein?

Thanks for any advice
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course you can't expect to understand research level physics with your undergrad degree, especially in a (seemingly) technical and highly specialized subfield of theoretical particle physics.
It seems like a good idea for you is to first get a Master's degree. Do 2 years of specialized study and see if you are still interested afterwards. If so, you can continue to a Ph.D.
Diving into a 5-year Ph.D. program while being uncertain whether you have the drive for it is a recipie for disaster.
 
Masters program in physics

I wish that Masters programs were more common in the US. I think this would be a perfect solution to my quandary, though I would still be somewhat at a loss for the field in which I'd apply for a masters.
Can anyone give me more information on Masters programs in the US? I'd always heard that they were very uncommon, most top schools don't offer such programs, etc. What type of school would offer this?
 
I'm not being rude but let me ask, why do you want a Master's in Physics? It won't really improve your job prospects, it will cost a lot of money (either both in tuition and opportunity cost or just in opportunity cost), and will be very challenging. What are you trying to achieve?
 
No, you're not being rude at all.
I am interested in learning more about masters programs following a previous recommendation, based on what I said in my original question. I don't feel as though I have seen enough of what the various branches of physics have to offer, yet I need to choose which graduate school to apply to or attend based on my interests. It seems like getting a masters and then getting a Ph.D. would be a possible solution to this. But if you are saying that masters programs are generally unfunded, I should probably try for a Ph.D. program directly, and try to find schoos that have several areas that appeal to me.
 
I've never heard of a physics MS program that gave support. They could be out there. Some MS programs in Engineering give support. Getting into the Ph.D. at a school with a comprehensive program is the best bet if you've got your heart set on physics. Otherwise you could study Engineering if you want something physics-related.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top