News CIA rigged at least one Nobel Prize

  • Thread starter Thread starter fourier jr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nobel prize
AI Thread Summary
The CIA played a controversial role in the awarding of the Nobel Prize to Boris Pasternak in 1958, allegedly influencing the decision to favor him over Italian writer Alberto Moravia. Reports suggest that the CIA facilitated the publication of Pasternak's "Doctor Zhivago," which was banned in the Soviet Union, by stealing a copy of the original text and ensuring it was available to the Nobel Committee. This intervention was seen as a strategic move to annoy the USSR by recognizing a dissident writer. Despite winning the prize, Pasternak faced personal tragedy, as he was unable to accept the award without risking exile from his homeland. Ultimately, the CIA's actions are debated, with some arguing they merely enabled the recognition of a suppressed literary work.
fourier jr
Messages
764
Reaction score
13
they've also been involved in book publishing:

January 10, 2009, 21:55
Nobel Prize ‘stolen’ by CIA
If you think the US intelligence agency, the CIA, has no interest in literature, you are very much mistaken. According to Italy’s La Stampa newspaper, it played a decisive role in giving the Nobel Prize to Russia’s Boris Pasternak, the author of Doctor Zhivago, instead of Italian writer Alberto Moravia.


Back in 1958 the three big names in the running for the Nobel Prize were Alberto Moravia, Boris Pasternak and Denmark’s Karen Blixen. Pasternak suddenly got the support of Anders Esterling, the Academy permanent secretary. His colleagues were surprised. After all, the Russian author had already been nominated in 1946 for his novel “Doctor Zhivago”, which was forbidden in the Soviet Union. Then the opinion of Slavic expert Anton Kalgren was taken into account. He claimed Pasternak’s books are not understandable for many people.

In light of this, the Nobel Academy lost interest in Pasternak’s work. But unexpectedly in 1957 Harry Martinson described him as the most outstanding Soviet writer of the century. That, according to La Stampa, was because the West found out that “Doctor Zhivago” was banned in the author’s Motherland, making Pasternak popular again. His book became known in the West after it was smuggled out of Russia and published in Italy.

But in 1958, as La Stampa notes, Moravia had the advantage. In Sweden, where the Academy is based, his works were widely known, but Pasternak’s famous novel hadn’t been published yet. Esterling read it in Italian and said its author was “one of the most outstanding writers of our time”.

But finally, according to La Stampa, it was the CIA that decided the winner. A CIA lobby operating in the Swedish Academy wanted to annoy the USSR by giving the award to a dissident writer. So, it was Pasternak who became the Nobel Prize that year. But victory turned to personal tragedy for Pasternak himself. In the USSR it was made clear he was free to go to Stockholm to get his award – but if he did, he was told, he wouldn’t be allowed back home. That was something the writer, who was deeply attached to his homeland, couldn’t bear, so he didn’t receive the prize. Two year later, when he was dying, he confessed he would have been happy to get it. In 1961 he was rehabilitated in the Soviet Union, but “Doctor Zhivago” wasn’t published in the USSR until 1988.

Italy was compensated the following year, when writer Salvatore Quasimodo was awarded the prestigious literary prize.

http://www.russiatoday.com/features/news/35742

& here's RIA Novosti's coverage, which is more in-depth:
http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20090119/119705315.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
the CIA did nothing more than steal and publish the original Russian text

fourier jr said:
CIA rigged at least one Nobel Prize

Hi Fourier jr! :smile:

erm … your quotations are from a sensationalised English-language summary of a rather biased Italian account in La Stampa (http://www.lastampa.it/redazione/cmsSezioni/cultura/200901articoli/39884girata.asp

It gives the impression that CIA pressure achieved the Nobel prize for Pasternak …

but all the CIA did was steal a copy of the original Russian text, and present it to the Nobel committee …

this was needed because the Nobel Committee only considers original-language texts, and Russia wasn't allowing any out of the country. :rolleyes:

From your other link:
The aircraft carrying a passenger with a copy of the novel was ordered to land in the airport of Malta in the Mediterranean. The pilot apologized for the stopover. The annoyed passengers went to the airport's departure lounge, while CIA agents found the right suitcase, took out the text, and photographed it page by page. They put the text back into the suitcase, and two hours later the aircraft was airborne again. The passengers arrived at their destination. The owner of the suitcase was in blissful ignorance of what had happened with it.

However, under the Nobel Committee's rules, the novel had to be in the original. Here the CIA-copied version came in handy. Every hour counted in what was a now-or-never situation. Through proxy funds, the CIA gave money to urgently publish the novel in Russian. To cover up the traces of stealing, the CIA made galleys from the photocopies and printed the Russian version in the academic publishing house of Muton in the Hague without any copyrights in the August of 1958.

The Swedish Academy had no more obstacles for awarding Pasternak, and on October 23, 1958 the Nobel cannon shot at the Soviet government. Pasternak received a Nobel Prize for outstanding merits in modern lyric poetry and for continuing the traditions of the great Russian novel.

Pasternak then won the prize on his own merits.

The CIA did not "rig" the Nobel prize :frown:

they only made eligible a book which would have been a walkover from the start had Pasternak's own country not suppressed it. :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Replies
105
Views
13K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Back
Top