Circle to Circle Tangent Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter billinr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Tangent
billinr
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am trying to write an Excel template which will chart two circles and their external tangent lines - similar to a belt and two pulley system.

I have the formulas to calculate and chart the circles. I am looking for a formula to calculate the tangent points between the circles, given the following criteria:

Circle 1 will always have a center at 0,0
Circle 2 will always be larger than circle 1
Center points of both circles will always be on the X axis
Diameters and center distances are known, and will change with the system design

Is there such a formula published?

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I should have included an example...

Circle 1 has a diameter of 21
Circle 2 has a diameter of 106.7
Center distance is 152.2

Thanks
 
In regard to the "upper belt":

Define the center of circle 1 as point A and the center of circle 2 as point B.

The line segment tangent to the top of both circles will intersect circle 1 at point C and circle 2 at point D. Radius AC of circle 1 will be parallel to radius BD of circle 2 (since both are perpendicular to the "belt" CD).

You can then construct a line segment parallel to line segment CD (the upper belt) from the center of circle 1 (point A) to radius BD of circle 2. Call this intersection point E. This line segment AE will have the same length as segment CD. It will also divide radius BD of circle 2 into 2 segments; DE with a length equal to radius AC of circle 1 (21) and BE with a length equal to the difference between the two radii

\left(\frac{106.7}{2} - \frac{21}{2}\right) = 42.85.

Now you have right triangle ABE with right angle AEB and hypoteneuse AB = 152.2. The angle of radius BD of circle 2 (angle ABE) can be found by

\cos^{-1}\left(\frac{42.85}{152.2}\right)

Or, more generally

\cos^{-1} \left(\frac{R2 - R1}{D} \right)

where R1 is the radius of circle 1, R2 is the radius of circle 2, and D is the distance between the centers of the circles.

The tangent point of circle 1 is then at (x_1, y_1)[/tex]<br /> The tangent point of circle 2 is at (x_2, y_2)[/tex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; X_1 = \frac{R1^2 - (R1 \times R2)}{D}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Y_1 = \sqrt{R1^2 - {X_1}^2}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; X_2 =D - \frac{R2^2 - (R1 \times R2)}{D}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Y_2 = \sqrt{R2^2 - (D - X_2)^2}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Use similar logic to find the &amp;quot;lower belt&amp;quot;
 
Last edited:
I made a couple of corrections to my last post.

1) I originally mistook the diameter values given as radius values

2) There were typos in my formulas
 
Thank you very much for the help.
Your formulas worked to complete my spreadsheet.
I really appreciate your assistance.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top