Circle to Circle Tangent Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter billinr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Tangent
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on creating an Excel template to chart two circles and their external tangent lines, akin to a belt and pulley system. The user seeks a formula to calculate the tangent points between two circles, with specific parameters such as fixed center positions and known diameters. Key calculations involve defining the centers of the circles, using trigonometric functions to determine angles, and deriving tangent point coordinates based on the circles' radii and center distance. Corrections were made regarding the interpretation of diameter values and formula typos. The provided formulas successfully aided in completing the spreadsheet for the user's needs.
billinr
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am trying to write an Excel template which will chart two circles and their external tangent lines - similar to a belt and two pulley system.

I have the formulas to calculate and chart the circles. I am looking for a formula to calculate the tangent points between the circles, given the following criteria:

Circle 1 will always have a center at 0,0
Circle 2 will always be larger than circle 1
Center points of both circles will always be on the X axis
Diameters and center distances are known, and will change with the system design

Is there such a formula published?

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I should have included an example...

Circle 1 has a diameter of 21
Circle 2 has a diameter of 106.7
Center distance is 152.2

Thanks
 
In regard to the "upper belt":

Define the center of circle 1 as point A and the center of circle 2 as point B.

The line segment tangent to the top of both circles will intersect circle 1 at point C and circle 2 at point D. Radius AC of circle 1 will be parallel to radius BD of circle 2 (since both are perpendicular to the "belt" CD).

You can then construct a line segment parallel to line segment CD (the upper belt) from the center of circle 1 (point A) to radius BD of circle 2. Call this intersection point E. This line segment AE will have the same length as segment CD. It will also divide radius BD of circle 2 into 2 segments; DE with a length equal to radius AC of circle 1 (21) and BE with a length equal to the difference between the two radii

\left(\frac{106.7}{2} - \frac{21}{2}\right) = 42.85.

Now you have right triangle ABE with right angle AEB and hypoteneuse AB = 152.2. The angle of radius BD of circle 2 (angle ABE) can be found by

\cos^{-1}\left(\frac{42.85}{152.2}\right)

Or, more generally

\cos^{-1} \left(\frac{R2 - R1}{D} \right)

where R1 is the radius of circle 1, R2 is the radius of circle 2, and D is the distance between the centers of the circles.

The tangent point of circle 1 is then at (x_1, y_1)[/tex]<br /> The tangent point of circle 2 is at (x_2, y_2)[/tex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; X_1 = \frac{R1^2 - (R1 \times R2)}{D}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Y_1 = \sqrt{R1^2 - {X_1}^2}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; X_2 =D - \frac{R2^2 - (R1 \times R2)}{D}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Y_2 = \sqrt{R2^2 - (D - X_2)^2}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Use similar logic to find the &amp;quot;lower belt&amp;quot;
 
Last edited:
I made a couple of corrections to my last post.

1) I originally mistook the diameter values given as radius values

2) There were typos in my formulas
 
Thank you very much for the help.
Your formulas worked to complete my spreadsheet.
I really appreciate your assistance.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top