MHB Determining Diameter of Pipe with Drilled Hole

  • Thread starter Thread starter Casio1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on defining the diameter of a pipe with a drilled hole, distinguishing between outer diameter (OD) and inner diameter (ID). Participants clarify that the outer diameter refers to the full width of the pipe, while the inner diameter is the width of the hole drilled inside. The conversation also touches on calculating the thickness of the pipe wall, which is determined by the difference between OD and ID. There is some confusion regarding formulas for calculating the inner diameter based solely on the outer diameter, emphasizing that such calculations require both measurements. Overall, understanding these distinctions is essential for accurately addressing problems related to pipe dimensions.
Casio1
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
A textbook shows a circle with a line drawn through the centre and advises that the line represents the diameter of the circle, ok with that, but what happens if the circle was a pipe and the pipe had a hole drilled into it, so the pipe now has an outer diameter of 10 but the hole inside the pipe is 5.

How do you define the diameter of the pipe now, is it at the outer edge of the circle or the inner circle diameter, where the hole was drilled through?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Circle properties.png
    Circle properties.png
    8.4 KB · Views: 120
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In applications, you call one the inner diameter, and the other the outer diameter. Common abbreviations are ID and OD.
 
Casio said:
A textbook shows a circle with a line drawn through the centre and advises that the line represents the diameter of the circle, ok with that, but what happens if the circle was a pipe and the pipe had a hole drilled into it, so the pipe now has an outer diameter of 10 but the hole inside the pipe is 5.

How do you define the diameter of the pipe now, is it at the outer edge of the circle or the inner circle diameter, where the hole was drilled through?

Thanks.

You have an outer diameter and an inner diameter as Ackbach said and any good textbook/exam paper/problem/application will make this clear. For a thin pipe you may be able to assume they are equal, especially if the gap in the middle is comparatively large.

Consider this picture of a washer (it's the same as a cross-section of your pipe but easier to visualise) - the red horizontal line is the outer diameter and the blue horizontal line is the inner diameter.

vZjdkZw


You usually come across these problems when you need to find the area of the shaded part (or, using the example above, the area of the washer)
 
SuperSonic4 said:
You have an outer diameter and an inner diameter as Ackbach said and any good textbook/exam paper/problem/application will make this clear. For a thin pipe you may be able to assume they are equal, especially if the gap in the middle is comparatively large.

Consider this picture of a washer (it's the same as a cross-section of your pipe but easier to visualise) - the red horizontal line is the outer diameter and the blue horizontal line is the inner diameter.

vZjdkZw


You usually come across these problems when you need to find the area of the shaded part (or, using the example above, the area of the washer)

I was OK with the above understanding but I did have a method for calculating the inside diameter as above, which I thought was something like;

OD^2 - (OD^2 - Id^2) / pi

The problem is that I can't find the original material I got the above out of so am at a loss if the above is correct or I have got something wrong?

The other problem is that I believe that in your washer example as is the same as my pipe, the annulus is the wall, and there is only one circular wall and some people are trying to tell me there are two walls when trying to calculate the thickness of the wall?

I had this lot in a book which I can't find now:o
 
Casio said:
I was OK with the above understanding but I did have a method for calculating the inside diameter as above, which I thought was something like;

OD^2 - (OD^2 - Id^2) / pi
I don't understand what you mean here. You said this was "a method for calculating the inside diameter" but the formula involves the inside diameter. You can't have a formula for inner diameter based only on the outer diameter because you can drill a hole in a solid pipe with diameter anywhere from 0 up to the outer diameter.

The problem is that I can't find the original material I got the above out of so am at a loss if the above is correct or I have got something wrong?

The other problem is that I believe that in your washer example as is the same as my pipe, the annulus is the wall, and there is only one circular wall and some people are trying to tell me there are two walls when trying to calculate the thickness of the wall?

The people, I suspect, are talking about the two sides of the 'wall'. The thickness of the 'wall'- actually of the pipe- is the difference between inner and outer radius- that is (OD- ID)/2, half the difference of outer diameter and inner diameter because 'radius' is half the 'diameter'.

I had this lot in a book which I can't find now:o
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top