Circuit Analysis- Node Voltage Problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a node voltage problem in circuit analysis, focusing on the application of Kirchhoff's Current Law and Ohm's Law to derive equations for unknown voltages in a circuit. Participants explore their approaches to solving the problem and the discrepancies in their results.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents seven equations for seven unknowns but questions their correctness after obtaining results that differ from classmates.
  • Another participant suggests that only two equations are necessary due to the presence of only two unknown nodes, proposing a simpler approach.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the published answers, noting that classmates have arrived at different results.
  • A participant mentions the importance of substituting values to check for inconsistencies in the equations derived.
  • There is a discussion about the use of Kirchhoff's Current Law versus other methods, with differing opinions on the effectiveness of each approach.
  • Participants share their computed values for voltages, with one reporting results that differ significantly from those of classmates, raising questions about potential computational errors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the equations or the computed values for the voltages. Multiple competing views and approaches to the problem remain evident throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the potential for computational errors and the complexity of the equations involved, suggesting that assumptions about the circuit configuration may affect the outcomes. There is also mention of a lack of published answers for comparison.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners in electrical engineering or physics who are grappling with circuit analysis, particularly in understanding different approaches to node voltage problems and the application of circuit laws.

CyrilAmethyst
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
In the attached picture, I have the problem and the equations I've come up with to solve for the requested variables. I have found seven equations for the seven unknowns, however, after plugging them into a calculator my answer is wrong. Which equation(s) is/are wrong, and why?
Relevant equations
Kirchoff's Current Law- sum of currents entering node = sum of currents leaving it
Ohm's Law- Voltage = Current * Resistance
 

Attachments

  • node voltage.png
    node voltage.png
    18.1 KB · Views: 551
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi CyrilAmethyst. Welcome to the famous Physics Forums. :smile:

I can't spot any mistakes there. Have you substituted your results to find whether any inconsistency shows up? There is always the possibility that the published answer is wrong. :mad:
 
Last edited:
I also think your equations are correct. However, you are making life hard for yourself. You have really only 2 unlnown nodes, so two equations suffice. (The 12V node is obvious and the node at the bottom of the 1 ohm resistor is obviously 5(12 - v1). So just sum currents at v1 and v2.
 
NascentOxygen: Thanks for the welcome! I've found help on here from other people posting their problems so I figured I'd see if I could find some help myself. There isn't a published answer, just two of my fellow classmates are coming up with something different. Having substituted the values in, I'm not seeing any blatant inconsistencies, so I think I'm going to have to turn in what I have (with the solved equations, rather) and move on.

rude man: But wouldn't you need the value of Vo to solve that? And to solve for Vo you'd need at least one more equation, and every other possible equation I can think of involves the different currents, so you'd need another... and that's sort of how it escalated to seven equations. While I'll likely have already turned in the assignment by the time you respond, it'd be great if you could show me where I could have had an easier time for the future!

Thank you both so much for your help, regardless!

EDIT: Also, is there a 'thanking' system on these forums, to give you guys credit for answering my question?
 
Last edited:
CyrilAmethyst; said:
There isn't a published answer, just two of my fellow classmates are coming up with something different. Having substituted the values in, I'm not seeing any blatant inconsistencies, so I think I'm going to have to turn in what I have (with the solved equations, rather) and move on.
What's your answer for V2?

EDIT: Also, is there a 'thanking' system on these forums, to give you guys credit for answering my question?

B
e
l
o
w


 
Last edited:
CyrilAmethyst said:
rude man: But wouldn't you need the value of Vo to solve that?

Yes, but you know Vo = 12 - v1.

Your two equations, for future reference, would be

(12 - v1)/R2 = (v1 - v2)/R8 + v1/R4 + 3

(v1 - v2)/R8 + 3 = [v2 + 5(12 - v1)]/R1

I have used R1 = 1 ohm, R2 = 2 ohms, etc. for clarification. As always I favor labeling all components and saving numbers for the very end only. That allows units checking term-by-term.

Note that I have substituted -5(12 - v1) for the voltage at the bottom of R1. You could have let that voltage = v3, then the second equation would have been (v1 - v2)/R8 + 3 = (v2 - v3)/R1 and a third equation would go v3 = -5(12 - v1).
[/quote]

EDIT: Also, is there a 'thanking' system on these forums, to give you guys credit for answering my question?[/QUOTE]

There should be a 'thanks' button somewhere; however, it was just announced that the PF sites are being revamped ("PF 4.0"), with a new 'like' button in lieu of the old 'thanks' one. Stay tuned!

Meanwhile - yer' welcome!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
In the end I got V1=~7V and V2=~24V. I can't check the exact numbers because the paper's already gone in, but several of my colleagues settled on V1=~-10 and V2=~-100. However, one of them seemed to use the same equations as I did at first glance, so perhaps I just made a computational error.

So basically, rude man, you used simply two Kirchoff's Current Law equations, just substituted all of the currents with their equivalents in terms of V1 and V2? I do appreciate all of the help!
 
I get this:

attachment.php?attachmentid=72440&stc=1&d=1408997391.png
 

Attachments

  • Ans.png
    Ans.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 553
CyrilAmethyst said:
In the end I got V1=~7V and V2=~24V. I can't check the exact numbers because the paper's already gone in, but several of my colleagues settled on V1=~-10 and V2=~-100. However, one of them seemed to use the same equations as I did at first glance, so perhaps I just made a computational error.

So basically, rude man, you used simply two Kirchoff's Current Law equations, just substituted all of the currents with their equivalents in terms of V1 and V2? I do appreciate all of the help!

No, I never use KCL. I think those fake currents are dumb! I did what you partially did - sum currents to zero at v1 and v2, that's all! That's all I ever do, and I've been doing it for 40 years! It minimizes the number of equations (providing you lump all series components together in one impedance).
 
  • #10
I got v1 = -10.9V, v2 = -100.4V using my two equations. So Vo = 12 - (-10.9) = + 22.9V.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K