Circuit for reactive archery target

  • Thread starter Thread starter Liza Sarychev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around creating a reactive archery target that activates a photography strobe when hit by an arrow. The user is experimenting with an Arduino and breadboard setup but is struggling to achieve functionality, particularly in connecting the strobe and ensuring reliable circuit closure with foil plates. Suggestions include using various sensors such as piezoelectric sensors, Hall effect sensors, or capacitive sensing to detect the arrow's impact, as well as considering simpler analog circuits instead of relying solely on the Arduino. The conversation also touches on the possibility of using long cables to connect multiple targets to a central Arduino or exploring alternative microcontrollers for cost-effectiveness. Overall, the focus is on finding reliable methods to trigger the strobe while ensuring the system can handle multiple targets efficiently.
Liza Sarychev
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi guys! I'm new to tinkering with electronics, but I would like to design a reactive archery target that consists of two foil plates, that connect when pierced with an arrow, closing a switch, causing a photography strobe to go off. Does anyone know where to start? I bought an arduino and a breadboard but haven't been successful in getting this thing to work yet.

I would also like to add multiple targets for a round of shooting (without walking up to the circuit to reset the system).

Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you!

Screen Shot 2016-07-20 at 9.35.32 AM.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Liza Sarychev said:
I'm new to tinkering with electronics, but I would like to design a reactive archery target that consists of two foil plates, that connect when pierced with an arrow, closing a switch, causing a photography strobe to go off. Does anyone know where to start?

That sounds like a nice project...
I bought an arduino and a breadboard but haven't been successful in getting this thing to work yet.

Do you apply voltage (5 V) to one foil, and measure the voltage on the other via the ADC (analogRead())? What kind of foil do you use, and how are the separated, are they going to be replaced after every shot?

It might also work by using a special arrow, or measuring the presence of an arrow capacitively (change in capacitance of the foil) or inductively, magnetically (hall sensor + magnet). - Or more easily, by an impact sensor! Simply a piezo speaker that picks up vibration (contact mic), that can be amplified and measured. Or some light/IR barrier... many possibilities there. - Do you need to know the exact position of the bolt on the target?
I would also like to add multiple targets for a round of shooting (without walking up to the circuit to reset the system).

Either use one arduino, and long cables to hook them all up to one central one, use multiple ones for every target or connect them to the player via radio (look up 433 MHz modules for simple serial communication (cheap, but error prone), or WiFi (ESP8266 and the like), or things like ZigBee/Xbee/nrf24l01 for more advanced/reliable systems).

I recently made a small test with laser diodes, and simple LDRs to activate a target in small point'n'shoot game prototype... but it's certainly not the same as using a bow and arrow! That needs more skill...
 
  • Like
Likes Liza Sarychev
What have you tried so far? The most straight forward way would be two pieces of tinfoil, separated by less than the length of the metallic arrow point. You may need an interrupt to respond quickly enough with the Arundino. You might consider skipping the computer and wiring the foil right to the strobe trigger.

If I were you, I would be posting this question on photography forums rather than electrical engineering. I'm sure that countless photographers have done similar things.
 
  • Like
Likes Liza Sarychev
Hi 1rel! Thank you for your response.

I cutout the flat part of a paper plate, fold it over on itself and glue foils to it, so that when the arrow pierces, it connects the two pieces together and closes the circuit. These would have to be replaced every shot. So far I've tried to connect the strobe, a resistor, and the switch in series hooked up to 5V on the Arduino and nothing is happening. Should I be doing something to protect the Arduino from the high voltage spike of the strobe?

I have thought about an induction target. I will look into the hall sensor + magnet scenario and the possibility of measuring a difference in capacitance. Because the arrow pierces the target (and 4 inches of foam behind it), an impact sensor wouldn't work I think. For this first round, I want to figure out how to get it to work the simplest way I can and then I'll experiment with different methods of triggering the strobe.

I am looking at using long cables to hook all of them to the central arduino. Is there a way to do this without an arduino?
 
You should have one foil attached to 5v, and the second foil attached to a voltage sensing input to the Arundio. Then a digital output from the Arundino triggers the strobe. Software in the Arundino senses the change in input and commands the trigger to fire.

Have you tried photography forums, books and magazines? Have you seen Mythbusters on TV? How do you think they trigger those high speed cameras? It is a very common thing to do. You should not need to design your own solution.
 
Liza Sarychev said:
Hi 1rel! Thank you for your response.
I cutout the flat part of a paper plate, fold it over on itself and glue foils to it, so that when the arrow pierces, it connects the two pieces together and closes the circuit.

Probably, it will be difficult to make this very reliable/consistent, because you never know if the the foils really make a good contact for every hit. You could try to use an https://www.arduino.cc/en/Reference/AttachInterruptinstead of polling the pin (via ADC or digital), that might catch the change in voltage on the pin when the arrow hit and raises/lowers the voltage for a short amount of time. https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/logic-levels ... using a pullup or pulldown resistor, and a capacitor to dampen/"extend" the spike - some kind of debounce circuit (it will certainly never give you a stable good contact, so a simple, repeated digitalRead() (polling) on the pin will possibly not work).

There's also an interesting material called velostat, that could help to make some kind of pressure sensor. Or to make it more conductive and reusable, you might use conductive fabric/textiles, and a conductive/metal arrow head.
These would have to be replaced every shot. So far I've tried to connect the strobe, a resistor, and the switch in series hooked up to 5V on the Arduino and nothing is happening.

When you'd like to work with the microcontroller/arduino, just print out some messages via serial to see what's happening. I'd leave the strobe away for now, to make the detection work first.

Should I be doing something to protect the Arduino from the high voltage spike of the strobe?

How do you trigger the strobe, with some kind of relay? I don't know much about that part...
I have thought about an induction target. I will look into the hall sensor + magnet scenario and the possibility of measuring a difference in capacitance. Because the arrow pierces the target (and 4 inches of foam behind it), an impact sensor wouldn't work I think. For this first round, I want to figure out how to get it to work the simplest way I can and then I'll experiment with different methods of triggering the strobe.

After thinking about it for a bit, I guess that it depends on the size and accuracy you need for the detector.

The infrared LED + photo diode/transistor solution might work, when the arrow only triggers in one tiny spot (precise hit).

On the other hand, with the piezo vibration detector idea, the problem would be that it would trigger also when the arrow hits the target just somewhere you don't want it to (it might be possible to hang the target on some springs, or dampen the vibration it with foam...).

Both of those solutions would not be that hard to get working, I think.
I am looking at using long cables to hook all of them to the central arduino. Is there a way to do this without an arduino?

Anorlunda mentioned, that you could leave the (tiny) computer away altogether, and try to detect it with an (analog) cirucit (in case of the piezo/IR solution, it would probably involve OpAmps as voltage amplifier, peak detector and schmitt trigger of some kind - I've once tried something like that for a pluck detector of a string...).
Or you can also use a different microcontroller (like the ATtiny85 for example, which is also Arduino compatible, but smaller and much cheaper, or some ARM controller for more speed/advanced features like cap sense) to get rid of the cost of the Arduino...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Liza Sarychev
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
48
Views
66K
Back
Top