Circuit Question - Combining/Redrawing Circuits

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Circuits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how a circuit was redrawn from one configuration to another. It clarifies that R1 and E1 are parallel to R2 and E2, along with a 6-ohm resistor, by introducing ideal voltage sources between nodes and ground. The placement of E1 and E2 is justified by adding voltage sources that maintain their respective voltages relative to ground. This approach is valid within lumped-parameter circuit theory, as it allows for the assumption of voltage sources at nodes that are held at constant voltages. Overall, the process of redrawing the circuit is explained through the concept of replacing hanging nodes with ideal voltage sources.
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
Circuit Question -- Combining/Redrawing Circuits

I don't understand how they the circuit on the left was redrawn to be the circuit on the right.

1. How did they know R1 and E1 were parallel to R2 and E2 and the 6 ohm resistor?

2. How did they know that E1 should be position as it is in the picture? Same question for E2.
 

Attachments

  • QQ.jpg
    QQ.jpg
    4.3 KB · Views: 492
Physics news on Phys.org
You think you could make the image just a little smaller? I can almost read this one.
 
phinds said:
You think you could make the image just a little smaller? I can almost read this one.

I hope this one is better
 

Attachments

  • AA.jpg
    AA.jpg
    5.8 KB · Views: 466
Miike012 said:
I don't understand how they the circuit on the left was redrawn to be the circuit on the right.

1. How did they know R1 and E1 were parallel to R2 and E2 and the 6 ohm resistor?

2. How did they know that E1 should be position as it is in the picture? Same question for E2.

Take the nodes marked E1 and E2 in the first picture, and place ideal, constant voltage sources (or ideal batteries in this case) with the appropriate emf (voltage) between those nodes and ground. Connect all your grounds, and you should get the second picture (except without RL, since that wasn't in the blue part).

For example, in the first picture, E1 is just hanging there at -6 V. Instead of letting it hang there like that, add in a 6 V source between E1 and ground, paying attention to the polarity such that the original point E1 is negative 6 V with respect to ground. Do the same sort of thing for E2 (except +10 V). Then connect all the grounds together.

You can do that because when a node is "hanging" at a constant voltage like that, it is assumed that a voltage source is present, even though it's not in the diagram. So it's okay to put one in. You're not violating anything with lumped-parameter circuit theory by doing so.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top