[Circuits] Calculating the Norton Equivalent

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Norton equivalent of a circuit, specifically focusing on the computation of the Norton current, \(I_N\). Participants explore various methods for simplifying the circuit, including nodal analysis and Thevenin equivalents, while addressing errors in initial calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to compute \(I_N\) using a nodal analysis approach but arrives at a value of 3A, while the expected answer is 1A.
  • Another participant questions the validity of replacing a current source with a voltage source, prompting a discussion on simplification methods.
  • Some participants suggest that using the Thevenin equivalent for the subcircuit is a valid approach, arguing it simplifies the analysis without needing nodal equations.
  • There is a correction regarding the origin of a 240V value in the calculations, which one participant acknowledges as a typographical error.
  • Participants discuss the importance of correctly assigning current directions in node equations, with one suggesting a consistent method for writing node equations to minimize errors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate methods for circuit simplification and the correctness of initial calculations. There is no consensus on the best approach, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal method for calculating \(I_N\).

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful attention to signs in node equations and the potential for errors in circuit analysis when assumptions about current directions are not clearly defined.

ainster31
Messages
158
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



h_1390343963_6347373_a2b980a606.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am trying to compute ##I_N##.

I connected nodes a and b. The circuit after some simplification:

h_1390344359_4911840_0dbd81aae2.png


$$\frac { 180-{ V }_{ 1 } }{ 20 } =\frac { 120-V_{ 1 } }{ 40 } \\ { V }_{ 1 }=240\quad V\\ \\ R=\frac { V }{ I } \\ 40=\frac { 120 }{ I_{ N } } \\ I_{ N }=3\quad A$$

The correct answer is 1A.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would you replace the 3amp current source with a 120 volt voltage source (I KNOW why you did it, but it's wrong and I want you to think about it)
 
phinds said:
Why would you replace the 3amp current source with a 120 volt voltage source (I KNOW why you did it, but it's wrong and I want you to think about it)

I did it to simplify the circuit and make the nodal analysis easier.
 
Actually, changing the 3A / 40Ω subcircuit to its Thevenin equivalent works here. You're left with a simple series circuit, so no need for nodal analysis. Just calculate the current from the given resistances and voltages.
 
gneill said:
Actually, changing the 3A / 40Ω subcircuit to its Thevenin equivalent works here. You're left with a simple series circuit, so no need for nodal analysis. Just calculate the current from the given resistances and voltages.

Is there something wrong with my first attempt?
 
ainster31 said:
Is there something wrong with my first attempt?

Yes. Where did the 240V come from ?
 
gneill said:
Yes. Where did the 240V come from ?

I typed it wrong. I have fixed it now. Sorry about that.
 
ainster31 said:
I typed it wrong. I have fixed it now. Sorry about that.

Okay, now you need to correct the signs in your node equation. The left hand side yields a current flowing into the node from the 180V supply. On the right hand side you should therefore have a current flowing from the node to the 120V supply. You've got the right hand side yielding a current flowing from the 120V supply to the V1 node instead.

I find it easier, and less prone to error, to write all node equations from the perspective of the node itself and assuming that all currents are flowing out of the node (my choice of direction; you could choose the opposite if you wish). Sum all these currents on the same side of the equals and equate to zero:

##\frac{V1 - 180}{20} + \frac{V1 - 120}{40} = 0##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
gneill said:
Okay, now you need to correct the signs in your node equation. The left hand side yields a current flowing into the node from the 180V supply. On the right hand side you should therefore have a current flowing from the node to the 120V supply. You've got the right hand side yielding a current flowing from the 120V supply to the V1 node instead.

I find it easier, and less prone to error, to write all node equations from the perspective of the node itself and assuming that all currents are flowing out of the node (my choice of direction; you could choose the opposite if you wish). Sum all these currents on the same side of the equals and equate to zero:

##\frac{V1 - 180}{20} + \frac{V1 - 120}{40} = 0##

Ah, that makes sense. Yeah, I think I'm going to adopt the same convention to avoid these types of mistakes again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K