Circuits: What is wrong with my polarities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a transient circuit problem involving an inductor and a switch. The initial current through the inductor was incorrectly assumed to flow in the same direction as the variable current iR(t), leading to errors in the Laplace transform calculations. The user realized that the initial current should have been added rather than subtracted in the equations due to its opposite direction. After correcting this mistake, the calculations yielded the expected results consistent with the textbook answer. The key takeaway is the importance of maintaining consistent polarity when dealing with initial conditions in circuit analysis.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



I am working on this transient problem. When the switch is open, current only flows in the right loop and so the initial current on the inductor is io+ = 4A flowinf downward through the inductor.

When the switch is thrown at t = 0, the other loop gets started. I reduced the circuit to a Thevenin equivalent as shown. Now, I know that I am supposed to be solving for the i(t) shown in the last diagram, but I know from the 6A current source in the second to last diagram that my the real current is flowing in the opposite direction. So instead, I will solve for the real current iR(t) flowing counter clockwise and then just negate it to yield the i(t) asked for.


Since I know the direction of the real current iR(t), I have labeled the polarities of my circuit elements accordingly. However, when I solve the loop equation:

1.
(12/5)*iR + 10*i'R = 72/5​

using the Laplace transform, I get

2.
(12/5)*I(s)R + 10*sIR(s) - 10*4 = 72/5​

3.
iR(t) = 6[1 - (1/3)*e-6t/25]​

so that

4.
i(t) = 2*e-6t/25 - 6​

But the answer in the book is

5.
i(t) = 10*e-6t/25 - 6​

which I can rectify by messing with the signs in my loop equation. What am I doing wrong here?

Perhaps it has to do with the fact that my initial condition is a negative current with respect to iR, so instead of subtracting it in the Laplace domain (equation 2), I should have added it? Actually, I am quite confident that that is what it is. What do you think?


EDIT Solved: That was the mistake. Since the initial current through the inductor was 'downward,' it was directed opposite my assumed positive direction for iR(t). So when the Laplace calls for the IC, the sign has to be consistent.

ckt1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The correct equation is then2.(12/5)*I(s)R + 10*sIR(s) + 10*4 = 72/5 which yields 3.iR(t) = 6[1 + (1/3)*e-6t/25] and 4.i(t) = 10*e-6t/25 - 6As expected. Homework Equations1.(12/5)*iR + 10*i'R = 72/5 2.(12/5)*I(s)R + 10*sIR(s) - 10*4 = 72/5 3.iR(t) = 6[1 - (1/3)*e-6t/25] The Attempt at a Solution I figured out that I was making a mistake in my Laplace transform. I assumed that the initial current through the inductor was in the same direction as iR, but it was actually in the opposite direction. So when I went to compute the Laplace transform, I had to add the 4 A instead of subtracting it. Once I made this change, the equation yielded the correct answer.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
737
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
889
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
307
Back
Top