dbeeo
- 2
- 0
After doing various searching through the google, most of the circular error probability I found are expressed interm of \sigma_x and \sigma_y, which the CEP(circular error probability) usually looks like (assume normal distribution):
P(r) = \int\int \exp^{-.5(\frac{x^2}{\sigma_x^2}+\frac{y^2}{\sigma_y^2})} dxdy
or if we integrate the equation in term of polar coordinate
P(r) = \int\int \exp^{-.5(\frac{x^2}{\sigma_x^2}+\frac{y^2}{\sigma_y^2})} rd\theta dr
However, these equations are based on no correlation between \sigma_x and \sigma_y. And also, both \sigma_x and \sigma_y remains constant disregarding the change of r and \theta. Although we usually can express both x and y in term of r and \theta,
x=r\cos(\theta) and y=r\sin(t\theta)
But right now, I would like to have the CEP to express in r and \theta only, since the error I will have are \sigma_\theta and \sigma_r, and I would like to avoid the correlation issue. So, I'm just not know that if this equation will make sense or not,
P(r) = \int\int \exp^{-.5(\frac{r^2}{\sigma_r^2}+\frac{\theta^2}{\sigma_\theta^2})} rd\theta dr
Anyone has any input/idea about this? One of the other problem is that I need to expand the CEP into spherical error probability (SEP), which is in the 3dimensional. Although I have a paper to show somewhat a close form solution for this problem, however they still consider \sigma_x and \sigma_y with correlation as their error instead of \sigma_\theta and \sigma_r. But the complexity just increases way too high if I'm following this method.
P(r) = \int\int \exp^{-.5(\frac{x^2}{\sigma_x^2}+\frac{y^2}{\sigma_y^2})} dxdy
or if we integrate the equation in term of polar coordinate
P(r) = \int\int \exp^{-.5(\frac{x^2}{\sigma_x^2}+\frac{y^2}{\sigma_y^2})} rd\theta dr
However, these equations are based on no correlation between \sigma_x and \sigma_y. And also, both \sigma_x and \sigma_y remains constant disregarding the change of r and \theta. Although we usually can express both x and y in term of r and \theta,
x=r\cos(\theta) and y=r\sin(t\theta)
But right now, I would like to have the CEP to express in r and \theta only, since the error I will have are \sigma_\theta and \sigma_r, and I would like to avoid the correlation issue. So, I'm just not know that if this equation will make sense or not,
P(r) = \int\int \exp^{-.5(\frac{r^2}{\sigma_r^2}+\frac{\theta^2}{\sigma_\theta^2})} rd\theta dr
Anyone has any input/idea about this? One of the other problem is that I need to expand the CEP into spherical error probability (SEP), which is in the 3dimensional. Although I have a paper to show somewhat a close form solution for this problem, however they still consider \sigma_x and \sigma_y with correlation as their error instead of \sigma_\theta and \sigma_r. But the complexity just increases way too high if I'm following this method.