Circular Error Probability in polar error expression

dbeeo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
After doing various searching through the google, most of the circular error probability I found are expressed interm of \sigma_x and \sigma_y, which the CEP(circular error probability) usually looks like (assume normal distribution):

P(r) = \int\int \exp^{-.5(\frac{x^2}{\sigma_x^2}+\frac{y^2}{\sigma_y^2})} dxdy

or if we integrate the equation in term of polar coordinate

P(r) = \int\int \exp^{-.5(\frac{x^2}{\sigma_x^2}+\frac{y^2}{\sigma_y^2})} rd\theta dr

However, these equations are based on no correlation between \sigma_x and \sigma_y. And also, both \sigma_x and \sigma_y remains constant disregarding the change of r and \theta. Although we usually can express both x and y in term of r and \theta,

x=r\cos(\theta) and y=r\sin(t\theta)

But right now, I would like to have the CEP to express in r and \theta only, since the error I will have are \sigma_\theta and \sigma_r, and I would like to avoid the correlation issue. So, I'm just not know that if this equation will make sense or not,

P(r) = \int\int \exp^{-.5(\frac{r^2}{\sigma_r^2}+\frac{\theta^2}{\sigma_\theta^2})} rd\theta dr

Anyone has any input/idea about this? One of the other problem is that I need to expand the CEP into spherical error probability (SEP), which is in the 3dimensional. Although I have a paper to show somewhat a close form solution for this problem, however they still consider \sigma_x and \sigma_y with correlation as their error instead of \sigma_\theta and \sigma_r. But the complexity just increases way too high if I'm following this method.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your y expression has a t in it - seems to have come from nowhere. Your final P(r) is just wrong. Plug in the expressions for x and y as functions of r and θ to get the correct integral in polar coordinates.
 
it was a typo for y expression, it should be,

y=r\sin(\theta)

For the final P(r), I'm trying to find the other way that involve both \sigma_r and \sigma_\theta. So it seems like it is impossible unless i substitute them into the following expression?

P(r) = \int\int \exp^{-.5(\frac{x^2}{\sigma_x^2}+\frac{y^2}{\sigma_y^2})} rd\theta dr
 
Have you tried calculating the r and θ variances in terms of the x and y variances? Off hand it looks messy.
 
If you consider the case where the x and y variances are the same, the resultant polar coordinates have a distribution where the angle is uniform over a circle and r2 has an exponential distribution.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top