Circular Motion-When Will They Meet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gaimon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circular
AI Thread Summary
Two individuals are walking around a circular lake in opposite directions with angular speeds of 1.66E-3 rad/s and 3.24E-3 rad/s. The initial calculation for the time until they meet was incorrectly set up, leading to confusion. The correct interpretation of the angular speeds involves recognizing that 1.66E-3 means 1.66 multiplied by 10 to the power of -3. Once this notation is understood, the calculations become clearer, resolving the initial struggle. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly interpreting scientific notation in physics problems.
gaimon
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Here I am again...
Two people start at the same place and walk around a circular lake in opposite directions. One has an angular speed of 1.66E-3 rad/s, while the other has an angular speed of 3.24E-3 rad/s. How long will it be before they meet?

What I have done so far is to set 3.24t + 1.66t=2Pi

so t(4.9)=2Pi therefor t=1.282 s

or so I thought...problem is that it's wrong.
So then what am I doing wrong?
Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gaimon said:
Here I am again...
Two people start at the same place and walk around a circular lake in opposite directions. One has an angular speed of 1.66E-3 rad/s, while the other has an angular speed of 3.24E-3 rad/s. How long will it be before they meet?

What I have done so far is to set 3.24t + 1.66t=2Pi

so t(4.9)=2Pi therefor t=1.282 s

or so I thought...problem is that it's wrong.
So then what am I doing wrong?
Any help is appreciated.

Btw, where did the 'E-3' parts dissapear?
 
i thought that that was just notation
what does it really mean?
 
gaimon said:
i thought that that was just notation
what does it really mean?

1.66E-3 = 1.66\cdot 10^{-3}. It is usually written in text form as 1.66*10^-3, rather than 1.66E-3.
 
i can't believe that was all I had to do
been struggling for hours
Thank you so much!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top