Circular plate temperature distribution.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the temperature distribution of a circular plate governed by the diffusion equation, with specific boundary and initial conditions. The original poster presents an initial temperature distribution that appears to conflict with the boundary condition of zero temperature along the edge of the plate.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various mathematical approaches to solve the diffusion equation, including series solutions and the use of Bessel functions. There is a focus on determining coefficients through integrals and recursion relations. Some participants express uncertainty about the validity of their results and the implications of boundary conditions.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their calculations and results, with some expressing confidence in their findings while others question the consistency of the initial and boundary conditions. The discussion is ongoing, with no clear consensus reached regarding the correctness of the approaches or results presented.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted discrepancy between the initial temperature distribution and the boundary condition of zero temperature at the edge of the plate, leading to questions about the assumptions made in the problem setup. Participants reference external materials and examples to support their points, indicating a broader context of study.

davidbenari
Messages
466
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


The temperature distribution of a circ plate with radius ##a##, ##f(r,\theta,t)##, follows the diffusion equation ##\nabla^2f=\frac{1}{\alpha^2}\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}##, with a temperature of zero along the border. The initial temperature is ##f(r,\theta,0)=100rcos\theta##. Find the temperature distribution.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the typical solution that is ##\sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} J_n (\frac{k_{mn} r}{a})(A_{mn}cosn\theta+B_{mn}sinn\theta)exp(\frac{-\alpha^2}{a^2} k_{mn} t)## Where ##k_{mn}## is the mth zero of the nth bessel function.

Now I've found this at the initial time. ##\sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} J_n (\frac{k_{mn} r}{a})(A_{mn}cosn\theta+B_{mn}sinn\theta)=f(r,\theta,0)=100rcos\theta## To use an approach similar to finding a Fourier series. But I'm stuck here. I haven't a clue what to do here. Integrals are way to tedious here, and I don't see any way I'm getting a simple result.

Any ideas?
thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
UPDATE:

I've obtained that the only term that survives is the Am1 series and have calculated that each Am1 is

##A_{m1}=\frac{200}{a^2 J_2 (km1)} \int_{0}^{a} J1 (\frac{km1}{a}r)*r^2dr##
 
Last edited:
Im just proud of my result so I'm going to post it, hoping that someone will tell me if its wrong right or too complicated and can be simplified...

The integral ##\int_{0}^{a} J1(\frac{Km1}{a}r)*r^2dr## can be solved using the recursion relation ##\frac{d}{dx}[x^2J2(x)]=x^2J1(x)##. Wit this you obtain, after some manipulation:

##r^2 J1(\frac{Km1}{a}r)=\frac{a}{Km1}\frac{d}{dr}[r^2J2(\frac{Km1}{a}r)]##

If this is substituted in the integral you'll get that the integral is equivalent to ##\frac{a}{Km1}\int_{0}^{a}\frac{d}{dr}[r^2 J2(\frac{Km2 r}{a})]dr = \frac{a^3}{Km1}J2(km1)##

And therefore substituting this into the previous post one gets that

##Am1=\frac{200a}{Km1}##

This result looks so simple and familiar that I'm worrying that I could've done things simpler...

Any ideas?
 
The final distribution ##f(r,\theta,t)=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}\frac{200a}{Km1}J_1(\frac{Km1}{a}r)cos\theta e^{\alpha^2 \frac{Km1}{a^2}t}##
 
I haven't written all the calculations out, but looking over your work it all seems okay.

You mentioned the wrong Bessel identity, but you used the correct one when actually calculating the final result. I think you meant:

$$\frac{1}{\alpha} \frac{d}{dr} [r^{\nu} J_{\nu}(\alpha r)] = r^{\nu} J_{\nu - 1}(\alpha r)$$

Where ##\alpha = \frac{k_{m1}}{a}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davidbenari
my professor says in one of his notes that f=0 at the borders then this means your solution doesn't depend on ##\theta##. Isn't this completely wrong?
 
If the function value is a constant at the circular boundary (not just 0) then the solution is independent of \theta.
In your original post you say
davidbenari said:

Homework Statement


The temperature distribution of a circ plate with radius ##a##, ##f(r,\theta,t)##, follows the diffusion equation ##\nabla^2f=\frac{1}{\alpha^2}\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}##, with a temperature of zero along the border. The initial temperature is ##f(r,\theta,0)=100rcos\theta##. Find the temperature distribution.
If there is "a temperature of 0 along the border" as a boundary condition, the initial temperature cannot be ##100 r cos(\theta)##.
 
I know this seems weird but it is what is accepted in my book (Boas mathematical physics) and in my class.
 
  • #10
There you clearly have the same problem with discontinuity
 
  • #11
  1. Find the steady-state temperature distribution in a metal plate 10 cm square if one side is held at 100◦ and the other three sides at 0◦. Find the temperature at the center of the plate.

    This problem would also necessitate using discontinuity. The inferior side can have 100º then, when you hit the vertical wall, you'll get 0º suddenly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K