Circular vs. Cylindrical Charge Distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the similarities in the electric field equations derived from a disk of uniform charge density and a hollow cylinder, noting that both integrals appear structurally similar with only the variables R and z swapped. The participant questions whether this resemblance indicates a deeper physical relationship between the electric fields of these two geometries. The integration process for both cases involves using cosine to project the electric field along the axis, leading to similar forms of the final equations. The conclusion drawn is that despite differences in charge density, the electric fields along the axis for both shapes exhibit comparable mathematical behavior. This prompts further exploration into the implications of such similarities in electrostatics.
NullSpace0
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I recently had a problem set with two questions that seemed to give very similar answers. I'm not asking how to do this, so I don't think this post belongs in the homework section. Rather, I'm asking if the similarity I think I see has any deeper meaning in the physics of electric fields.

Let's say I want to find the electric field due to a disk of uniform charge density along the disk's axis. I would integrate and I end up getting something like:

E=∫(2*pi*sigma*z*r*dr)/(r^2+z^2)^3/2... note that z/sqrt(r^2+z^2) comes in from multiplying by the cosine of the angle to get only the portion along the axis. In this integral, z is a constant.

For a hollow cylinder, you get essentially the same integral: E=∫(2*pi*sigma*R*z*dz)/(R^2+z^2)^(3/2)... again, note that R/sqrt(R^2+z^2) come from the cosine of the angle for similar reasons. In this case, R is a constant.

So they seem to be the same integral with R and z swapped out. Other than the fact that sigma is different in each case, does the similarity mean anything? It's almost like it's saying that a cylinder and a circle have basically the same electric field along the axis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Or perhaps not?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top